<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Smith L</submitter><funding>European Hernia Society</funding><pagination>272</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12411575</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>29(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Mesh-augmented abdominal wall closure (Mesh prophylaxis) reduces incisional hernia rates in high-risk patients. In spite of a large body of evidence supporting its efficacy and safety, use of mesh prophylaxis is low in the US and UK, possibly due to negative perceptions of surgical mesh&lt;sup>(1-2)&lt;/sup>. This study aimed to assess the acceptability of mesh to patients and determine factors that influence acceptability.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Following ethical approval, a convergent mixed-methods study was conducted whereby patients who had undergone elective or emergency surgery (n=332) were approached to participate in a questionnaire assessing knowledge and opinions regarding mesh prophylaxis Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a subset of participants (n=12) and thematic</pubmed_abstract><journal>Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery</journal><pubmed_title>The invite study: incisional hernia prevention: prophylactic mesh from the patient's perspective.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12411575</pmcid><funding_grant_id>European Hernia Society</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Watts T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cornish J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Knight L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meggy A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torkington J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The invite study: incisional hernia prevention: prophylactic mesh from the patient's perspective.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Mesh-augmented abdominal wall closure (Mesh prophylaxis) reduces incisional hernia rates in high-risk patients. In spite of a large body of evidence supporting its efficacy and safety, use of mesh prophylaxis is low in the US and UK, possibly due to negative perceptions of surgical mesh&lt;sup>(1-2)&lt;/sup>. This study aimed to assess the acceptability of mesh to patients and determine factors that influence acceptability.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Following ethical approval, a convergent mixed-methods study was conducted whereby patients who had undergone elective or emergency surgery (n=332) were approached to participate in a questionnaire assessing knowledge and opinions regarding mesh prophylaxis Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a subset of participants (n=12) and thematic</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-07-15T09:45:08.768Z</modification><creation>2026-07-04T03:11:59.033Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12411575</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40906014</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s10029-025-03463-z</doi></cross_references></HashMap>