<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15(9)</volume><submitter>Rees S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To explore experience and prevalence of vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS) diagnosis in general practice using an anonymous patient survey.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Quantitative descriptive cross-sectional survey informed by previous qualitative interviews and developed with patient representatives, sent to people recorded in general practice as having a VLS diagnosis.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>General practices (n=24) in the UK (West Midlands).&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>n=177 respondents.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>One in five respondents reported that they had been misdiagnosed, and about a third reported that it was a struggle to get treatment. Only one third said they received regular check-ups, recommended in clinical guidelines. One-fifth reported they were not being treated with topical corticosteroids, the m</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e103415</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12414219</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Vulval lichen sclerosus in UK general practice: a cross-sectional survey of patient experience.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12414219</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Parsons H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rees S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hillman S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arnold S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Vulval lichen sclerosus in UK general practice: a cross-sectional survey of patient experience.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To explore experience and prevalence of vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS) diagnosis in general practice using an anonymous patient survey.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Quantitative descriptive cross-sectional survey informed by previous qualitative interviews and developed with patient representatives, sent to people recorded in general practice as having a VLS diagnosis.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>General practices (n=24) in the UK (West Midlands).&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>n=177 respondents.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>One in five respondents reported that they had been misdiagnosed, and about a third reported that it was a struggle to get treatment. Only one third said they received regular check-ups, recommended in clinical guidelines. One-fifth reported they were not being treated with topical corticosteroids, the m</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-29T22:22:42.475Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T06:12:59.422Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12414219</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40912698</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103415</doi></cross_references></HashMap>