<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15(39)</volume><submitter>Fotsop CG</submitter><pubmed_abstract>This work elucidates the thermo-kinetics of the thermal conversion of cameroonian kaolin to metakaolin as the main product. The thermokinetical parameters (activation energy &lt;i>E&lt;/i> &lt;sub>a&lt;/sub> and pre-exponential factor &lt;i>A&lt;/i>) for the kaolin conversion were calculated using model-free methods, &lt;i>i.e.&lt;/i> the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunrose (KAS) and the Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) method, and differential methods (Kissinger and Ozawa) additionally including iterative procedures for KAS and FWO methods (KAS-Ir; FWO-Ir). The cameroonian kaolin was heat-treated using three different heating rates, &lt;i>i.e.&lt;/i> 5, 20 and 40 K min&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup>, leading to metakaolin samples named MK-(5), MK-(20) and MK-(40). The TGA analysis showed a total mass loss of ∼12.5% in two steps related to the dehydration (step 1) and dehydroxylation (step 2). The &lt;i>E&lt;/i> &lt;sub>a&lt;/sub> of the two steps were most accurately determined using the iterative procedures KAS-Ir and FWO-Ir. The average &lt;i>E&lt;/i> &lt;sub>a&lt;/sub> values were 88.44/88.58 kJ mol&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup> for step 1 and 261.85/261.91 kJ mol&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup> for step 2, for the KAS-Ir and FWO-Ir models, respectively. The most probable mechanism function was determined by the multiple heating rate method (MHR) and the Coats-Redfern method. The kinetic analyses showed that the dehydroxylation of kaolin is controlled by a random nucleation and subsequent growth mechanism (G&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub>) and a second order chemical reaction (F&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>). Thermodynamic parameters, namely the entropy Δ&lt;i>S&lt;/i> &lt;sup&gt;≠&lt;/sup>, the enthalpy Δ&lt;i>H&lt;/i> &lt;sup>≠&lt;/sup> and Gibbs free energy Δ&lt;i>G&lt;/i> &lt;sup>≠&lt;/sup>, were evaluated. The average values of Δ&lt;i>S&lt;/i> &lt;sup>≠&lt;/sup>, Δ&lt;i>H&lt;/i> &lt;sup>≠&lt;/sup> and Δ&lt;i>G&lt;/i> &lt;sup>≠&lt;/sup> using both the KAS-Ir and FWO-Ir models exhibited less than 5% deviation. The obtained metakaolin samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR).</pubmed_abstract><journal>RSC advances</journal><pagination>32172-32187</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12415547</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Elucidation of the thermo-kinetics of the thermal decomposition of cameroonian kaolin: mechanism, thermodynamic study and identification of its by-products.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12415547</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Fotsop CG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scheffler F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lieb A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Elucidation of the thermo-kinetics of the thermal decomposition of cameroonian kaolin: mechanism, thermodynamic study and identification of its by-products.</name><description>This work elucidates the thermo-kinetics of the thermal conversion of cameroonian kaolin to metakaolin as the main product. The thermokinetical parameters (activation energy &lt;i>E&lt;/i> &lt;sub>a&lt;/sub> and pre-exponential factor &lt;i>A&lt;/i>) for the kaolin conversion were calculated using model-free methods, &lt;i>i.e.&lt;/i> the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunrose (KAS) and the Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) method, and differential methods (Kissinger and Ozawa) additionally including iterative procedures for KAS and FWO methods (KAS-Ir; FWO-Ir). The cameroonian kaolin was heat-treated using three different heating rates, &lt;i>i.e.&lt;/i> 5, 20 and 40 K min&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup>, leading to metakaolin samples named MK-(5), MK-(20) and MK-(40). The TGA analysis showed a total mass loss of ∼12.5% in two steps related to the dehydration (step 1) and dehydroxylation (step 2). The &lt;i>E&lt;/i> &lt;sub>a&lt;/sub> of the two steps were most accurately determined using the iterative procedures KAS-Ir and FWO-Ir. The average &lt;i>E&lt;/i> &lt;sub>a&lt;/sub> values were 88.44/88.58 kJ mol&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup> for step 1 and 261.85/261.91 kJ mol&lt;sup>-1&lt;/sup> for step 2, for the KAS-Ir and FWO-Ir models, respectively. The most probable mechanism function was determined by the multiple heating rate method (MHR) and the Coats-Redfern method. The kinetic analyses showed that the dehydroxylation of kaolin is controlled by a random nucleation and subsequent growth mechanism (G&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub>) and a second order chemical reaction (F&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>). Thermodynamic parameters, namely the entropy Δ&lt;i>S&lt;/i> &lt;sup&gt;≠&lt;/sup>, the enthalpy Δ&lt;i>H&lt;/i> &lt;sup>≠&lt;/sup> and Gibbs free energy Δ&lt;i>G&lt;/i> &lt;sup>≠&lt;/sup>, were evaluated. The average values of Δ&lt;i>S&lt;/i> &lt;sup>≠&lt;/sup>, Δ&lt;i>H&lt;/i> &lt;sup>≠&lt;/sup> and Δ&lt;i>G&lt;/i> &lt;sup>≠&lt;/sup> using both the KAS-Ir and FWO-Ir models exhibited less than 5% deviation. The obtained metakaolin samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR).</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-06-01T16:09:56.806Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T13:57:16.348Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12415547</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40927475</pubmed><doi>10.1039/d5ra05149e</doi></cross_references></HashMap>