<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>57(9)</volume><submitter>de Jong MJP</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), including choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), are alternative methods for biliary drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Data on long-term outcomes, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QoL) after EUS-CDS and PTBD are limited. Therefore, we created a registry to evaluate the outcomes of both drainage procedures.Patients with distal MBO who underwent EUS-CDS or PTBD after unsuccessful ERCP were included in this multicenter investigator-initiated prospective registry over an 18-month inclusion period. Primary end points were procedure-related AEs and mortality within 90 days post-pro</pubmed_abstract><journal>Endoscopy</journal><pagination>1004-1015</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12417859</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy results in fewer complications than percutaneous drainage following failed ERCP in malignant distal biliary obstruction.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12417859</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Venneman NG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuiken SD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hadithi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Jong MJP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bogte A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bruno MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Delft F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verdonk RC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quispel R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vrolijk JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Wijkerslooth TR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bisseling TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Siersema PD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Straathof JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Wanrooij RLJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bijlsma RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Basiliya K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vleggaar FP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Voermans RP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Geenen EM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy results in fewer complications than percutaneous drainage following failed ERCP in malignant distal biliary obstruction.</name><description>Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), including choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), are alternative methods for biliary drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Data on long-term outcomes, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QoL) after EUS-CDS and PTBD are limited. Therefore, we created a registry to evaluate the outcomes of both drainage procedures.Patients with distal MBO who underwent EUS-CDS or PTBD after unsuccessful ERCP were included in this multicenter investigator-initiated prospective registry over an 18-month inclusion period. Primary end points were procedure-related AEs and mortality within 90 days post-pro</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-06-02T01:03:25.037Z</modification><creation>2026-05-24T03:06:59.935Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12417859</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40209763</pubmed><doi>10.1055/a-2580-1316</doi></cross_references></HashMap>