<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Katsavelis D</submitter><funding>Dutch Research Council (NWO)</funding><funding>European Commission</funding><pagination>4792-4803</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12418494</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Serum proteomics plays a crucial role in biomarker discovery and disease research, yet the selection of an optimal sample preparation method remains challenging. Evaluating the accuracy of protein quantitation is of major importance and a vital part of a benchmarking study in proteomics, since clinical studies are based on the differential expression of certain proteins that can be used as biomarkers or be indicative of a pathological state. In this study, we performed a direct comparison of 6 widely used serum proteomic sample preparation workflows: In-gel digestion (IGD), Single-Pot Solid-Phase-enhanced Sample Preparation (SP3), Top 14 Abundant Protein Depletion (Top 14), Isopropanol/Trichloroacetic Acid (IPA/TCA) precipitation, PreOmics ENRICH-iST (PreOmics), and Seer Proteograph XT (Se</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of proteome research</journal><pubmed_title>Impact of Sample Preparation Strategies on the Quantitative Accuracy of Low-Abundance Serum Proteins in Shotgun Proteomics.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12418494</pmcid><funding_grant_id>184.034.019</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>JTFN-00102</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Permentier HP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Horvatovich P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Katsavelis D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Hart MGC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolters JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cremers TIFH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Impact of Sample Preparation Strategies on the Quantitative Accuracy of Low-Abundance Serum Proteins in Shotgun Proteomics.</name><description>Serum proteomics plays a crucial role in biomarker discovery and disease research, yet the selection of an optimal sample preparation method remains challenging. Evaluating the accuracy of protein quantitation is of major importance and a vital part of a benchmarking study in proteomics, since clinical studies are based on the differential expression of certain proteins that can be used as biomarkers or be indicative of a pathological state. In this study, we performed a direct comparison of 6 widely used serum proteomic sample preparation workflows: In-gel digestion (IGD), Single-Pot Solid-Phase-enhanced Sample Preparation (SP3), Top 14 Abundant Protein Depletion (Top 14), Isopropanol/Trichloroacetic Acid (IPA/TCA) precipitation, PreOmics ENRICH-iST (PreOmics), and Seer Proteograph XT (Se</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-26T20:15:52.486Z</modification><creation>2026-05-24T03:07:44.201Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12418494</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40857585</pubmed><doi>10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00572</doi></cross_references></HashMap>