<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Montero-Porras E</submitter><funding>HORIZON EUROPE Widening Participation and Strengthening the European Research Area</funding><funding>Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture</funding><funding>Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek</funding><funding>Service Public de Wallonie</funding><pagination>e0331348</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12425191</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Managing shared resources requires balancing personal profit and sustainability. This paper reports on a behavioural experiment testing how extraction defaults-either pro-social or exploitative-impact resource extraction in a common pool resource dilemma (CPRD). We find that an exploitative default increases average extraction compared to a control without a default, while a pro-social default temporarily reduces extraction. The effects of both defaults are temporary, and extraction levels converge to those in the control group, with the pro-social default fading faster. Notably, the influence of defaults depended on individual inclinations, with cooperative individuals extracting more under an exploitative default, and selfish individuals less under a pro-social default. Our findings suggest that while defaults can promote short-term sustainability, their long-term effects are limited, and their effectiveness depends on individual traits.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pubmed_title>From self-interest to collective action: The role of defaults in governing common resources.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12425191</pmcid><funding_grant_id>952215</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>31257234</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>40007793</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>G.0391.13N</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2010235-ARIAC</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>40005955</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Suchon R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montero-Porras E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fernandez Domingos E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lenaerts T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>From self-interest to collective action: The role of defaults in governing common resources.</name><description>Managing shared resources requires balancing personal profit and sustainability. This paper reports on a behavioural experiment testing how extraction defaults-either pro-social or exploitative-impact resource extraction in a common pool resource dilemma (CPRD). We find that an exploitative default increases average extraction compared to a control without a default, while a pro-social default temporarily reduces extraction. The effects of both defaults are temporary, and extraction levels converge to those in the control group, with the pro-social default fading faster. Notably, the influence of defaults depended on individual inclinations, with cooperative individuals extracting more under an exploitative default, and selfish individuals less under a pro-social default. Our findings suggest that while defaults can promote short-term sustainability, their long-term effects are limited, and their effectiveness depends on individual traits.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025</publication><modification>2026-06-03T02:25:20.376Z</modification><creation>2026-04-23T03:10:01.934Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12425191</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40934283</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0331348</doi></cross_references></HashMap>