<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>36(5)</volume><submitter>Tate S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is associated with poor outcomes owing to chemoresistance. Bevacizumab (Bev) is increasingly being used to treat advanced ovarian cancer; however, its efficacy in OCCC remains unclear. This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of frontline bevacizumab chemotherapy in patients with OCCC.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This retrospective multi-institutional study included patients diagnosed with advanced OCCC at eight institutions in Japan between 2008 and 2018. Patients were categorized into pre and post-market groups based on the Bev approval dates. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. Additionally, patients were classified into Bev-treated (Bev+) and non-Bev-treated (Bev-) groups, and their prognoses were compared.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 96 patients were in the pre-market group and 82 in the post-market group. The post-market group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with poor performance status and patients who underwent interval debulking surgery (p&lt;0.01 and p&lt;0.01, respectively). Univariate analysis demonstrated a better PFS in the post-market group (p=0.041). In multivariate analysis, better PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.52; p=0.002) and OS (HR=0.47; p=0.002) were observed in the post-market group than in the pre-market group. Bev+ patients had significantly better PFS and OS than Bev- patients in univariate (p&lt;0.001 and p&lt;0.001, respectively) and multivariate analyses (PFS: HR=0.36; p&lt;0.001 and OS: HR=0.21; p=0.001, respectively).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Incorporating Bev into frontline chemotherapy may improve outcomes in patients with advanced OCCC.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of gynecologic oncology</journal><pagination>e80</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12426751</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Bevacizumab in frontline chemotherapy improved the survival outcome for advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12426751</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Hirakawa T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seki T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ikeda S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Okamoto A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoshikawa N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suzuki E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takano H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koga K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shozu M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tate S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoshihara K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Akashi H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kajiyama H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tanaka N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Itoi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nishikimi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Unno Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Bevacizumab in frontline chemotherapy improved the survival outcome for advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Advanced ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is associated with poor outcomes owing to chemoresistance. Bevacizumab (Bev) is increasingly being used to treat advanced ovarian cancer; however, its efficacy in OCCC remains unclear. This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of frontline bevacizumab chemotherapy in patients with OCCC.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This retrospective multi-institutional study included patients diagnosed with advanced OCCC at eight institutions in Japan between 2008 and 2018. Patients were categorized into pre and post-market groups based on the Bev approval dates. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. Additionally, patients were classified into Bev-treated (Bev+) and non-Bev-treated (Bev-) groups, and their prognoses were compared.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 96 patients were in the pre-market group and 82 in the post-market group. The post-market group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with poor performance status and patients who underwent interval debulking surgery (p&lt;0.01 and p&lt;0.01, respectively). Univariate analysis demonstrated a better PFS in the post-market group (p=0.041). In multivariate analysis, better PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.52; p=0.002) and OS (HR=0.47; p=0.002) were observed in the post-market group than in the pre-market group. Bev+ patients had significantly better PFS and OS than Bev- patients in univariate (p&lt;0.001 and p&lt;0.001, respectively) and multivariate analyses (PFS: HR=0.36; p&lt;0.001 and OS: HR=0.21; p=0.001, respectively).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Incorporating Bev into frontline chemotherapy may improve outcomes in patients with advanced OCCC.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-04-08T19:16:08.093Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T12:11:17.75Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12426751</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40150913</pubmed><doi>10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e80</doi></cross_references></HashMap>