<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>17(17)</volume><submitter>Lode HN</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Objective:&lt;/b> Dinutuximab beta (DB) and naxitamab (NAXI) with GM-CSF are used for maintenance treatment of relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. The objective of this study was to systematically assess comparative efficacy of the two therapies within their designated indications in accordance with established clinical guidelines. &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> Relevant evidence was identified in systematic literature review. Individual patient data (IPD) from prospective clinical trials of DB were assessed and data on patients with disease in bone or bone marrow, as assessed in MRI, CT, mIBG or biopsy, with incomplete response to previous therapy were included. Patients with complete response, progressive disease and/or soft tissue disease were excluded. DB population was adjusted for sex, MYCN amplific</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancers</journal><pagination>2723</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12427561</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Dinutuximab Beta Versus Naxitamab in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma in Patients with Stable Disease, Minor Response or Partial Response and Disease in Bone or Bone Marrow: Systematic Review and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12427561</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ash S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sladowska K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Siebert N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Canete A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luksch R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Manzitti C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yaniv I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garaventa A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wieczorek A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Troschke-Meurer S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lode HN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anderson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gray J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kawalec P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ebeling T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ladenstein RL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holko P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valteau-Couanet D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Dinutuximab Beta Versus Naxitamab in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma in Patients with Stable Disease, Minor Response or Partial Response and Disease in Bone or Bone Marrow: Systematic Review and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.</name><description>&lt;b>Objective:&lt;/b> Dinutuximab beta (DB) and naxitamab (NAXI) with GM-CSF are used for maintenance treatment of relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. The objective of this study was to systematically assess comparative efficacy of the two therapies within their designated indications in accordance with established clinical guidelines. &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> Relevant evidence was identified in systematic literature review. Individual patient data (IPD) from prospective clinical trials of DB were assessed and data on patients with disease in bone or bone marrow, as assessed in MRI, CT, mIBG or biopsy, with incomplete response to previous therapy were included. Patients with complete response, progressive disease and/or soft tissue disease were excluded. DB population was adjusted for sex, MYCN amplific</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Aug</publication><modification>2026-04-08T19:47:55.645Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T14:33:12.684Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12427561</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40940820</pubmed><doi>10.3390/cancers17172723</doi></cross_references></HashMap>