{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Allam A"],"funding":["Perfetti Van Melle, s.p.a. Lainate (MI)"],"pagination":["2749"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12430410"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["17(17)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<b>Background:</b> Chewing gum is a simple, accessible tool with high user compliance, traditionally associated with oral health benefits. Although its potential effects on different aspects of health and well-being, beyond its oral applications, have been explored, the area remains relatively under-researched. This mapping review and evidence gap map (EGM) aimed to evaluate the existing literature on the non-oral health applications of chewing gum and to identify gaps in the literature. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) using tailored search strategies. Abstracts were screened against predefined eligibility criteria using EPPI-Reviewer version 6, with full texts reviewed only when relevant information "],"journal":["Nutrients"],"pubmed_title":["Chewing Gum and Health: A Mapping Review and an Interactive Evidence Gap Map."],"pmcid":["PMC12430410"],"funding_grant_id":["no grant number"],"pubmed_authors":["Camoni N","Cirio S","Cagetti MG","Salerno C","Campus G","Allam A"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Chewing Gum and Health: A Mapping Review and an Interactive Evidence Gap Map.","description":"<b>Background:</b> Chewing gum is a simple, accessible tool with high user compliance, traditionally associated with oral health benefits. Although its potential effects on different aspects of health and well-being, beyond its oral applications, have been explored, the area remains relatively under-researched. This mapping review and evidence gap map (EGM) aimed to evaluate the existing literature on the non-oral health applications of chewing gum and to identify gaps in the literature. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) using tailored search strategies. Abstracts were screened against predefined eligibility criteria using EPPI-Reviewer version 6, with full texts reviewed only when relevant information ","dates":{"release":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2025 Aug","modification":"2026-04-08T19:11:45.402Z","creation":"2026-04-08T12:03:30.764Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC12430410","cross_references":{"pubmed":["40944140"],"doi":["10.3390/nu17172749"]}}