<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Viswanathan M</submitter><funding>NIBIB NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>615-629</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12433017</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>91(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>A new nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE)-mediated saturation transfer signal at around -1.6 ppm, termed NOE(-1.6), has been reported at high fields of 7T and 9.4T previously. This study aims to validate the presence of this signal at a relatively low field of 4.7T and evaluate its variations in different brain regions and tumors.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Rats were injected with monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles to reduce the NOE(-1.6) signal. CEST signals were measured using different saturation powers before and after injection to assess the presence of this signal. Multiple-pool Lorentzian fits, with/without inclusion of the NOE(-1.6) pool, were performed on CEST Z-spectra obtained from healthy rat brains and rats with 9L tumors. These fits aimed to further validate the presence of the NOE(-1.6) signal and quantify its amplitude.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The NOE(-1.6) signal exhibited a dramatic change following the injection of monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles, confirming its presence at 4.7T. The NOE(-1.6) signal reached its peak at a saturation power of ∼0.75 μT, indicating an optimized power level. The multiple-pool Lorentzian fit without the NOE(-1.6) pool showed higher residuals around -1.6 ppm compared to the fit with this pool, further supporting the presence of this signal. The NOE(-1.6) signal did not exhibit significant variation in the corpus callosum and caudate putamen regions, but it showed a significant decrease in tumors, which aligns with previous findings at 9.4T.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>This study successfully demonstrated the presence of the NOE(-1.6) signal at 4.7T, which provides valuable insights into its potential applications at lower field strengths.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Magnetic resonance in medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Nuclear Overhauser enhancement imaging at -1.6 ppm in rat brain at 4.7T.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12433017</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 EB029443</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>S10 OD025085</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R03 EB029078</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Viswanathan M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kurmi Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zu Z</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Nuclear Overhauser enhancement imaging at -1.6 ppm in rat brain at 4.7T.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>A new nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE)-mediated saturation transfer signal at around -1.6 ppm, termed NOE(-1.6), has been reported at high fields of 7T and 9.4T previously. This study aims to validate the presence of this signal at a relatively low field of 4.7T and evaluate its variations in different brain regions and tumors.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Rats were injected with monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles to reduce the NOE(-1.6) signal. CEST signals were measured using different saturation powers before and after injection to assess the presence of this signal. Multiple-pool Lorentzian fits, with/without inclusion of the NOE(-1.6) pool, were performed on CEST Z-spectra obtained from healthy rat brains and rats with 9L tumors. These fits aimed to further validate the presence of the NOE(-1.6) signal and quantify its amplitude.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The NOE(-1.6) signal exhibited a dramatic change following the injection of monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles, confirming its presence at 4.7T. The NOE(-1.6) signal reached its peak at a saturation power of ∼0.75 μT, indicating an optimized power level. The multiple-pool Lorentzian fit without the NOE(-1.6) pool showed higher residuals around -1.6 ppm compared to the fit with this pool, further supporting the presence of this signal. The NOE(-1.6) signal did not exhibit significant variation in the corpus callosum and caudate putamen regions, but it showed a significant decrease in tumors, which aligns with previous findings at 9.4T.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>This study successfully demonstrated the presence of the NOE(-1.6) signal at 4.7T, which provides valuable insights into its potential applications at lower field strengths.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Feb</publication><modification>2026-06-01T14:00:26.381Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T13:16:10.409Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12433017</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37867419</pubmed><doi>10.1002/mrm.29896</doi></cross_references></HashMap>