<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Tajer BJ</submitter><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>21-34</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12433595</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>240</volume><pubmed_abstract>The axolotl salamander model has broad utility for regeneration studies, but this model is limited by a lack of efficient cell-culture-based tools. The Axolotl Limb-1 (AL-1) fibroblast line, the only available immortalized axolotl cell line, was first published over 20 years ago, but many established molecular biology techniques, such as lipofectamine transfection, CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis, and antibiotic selection, work poorly or remain untested in AL-1 cells. Innovating technologies to manipulate AL-1 cells in culture and study their behavior following transplantation into the axolotl will complement in-vivo studies, decrease the number of animals used, and enable the faster, more streamlined investigation of regenerative biology questions. Here, we establish transfection, mutagenesis, an</pubmed_abstract><journal>Methods (San Diego, Calif.)</journal><pubmed_title>Optimized toolkit for the manipulation of immortalized axolotl fibroblasts.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12433595</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R25 GM109436</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HD095494</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Fei JF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bohm S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Min S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roy S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Souchet NR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Whited JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Decaux A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kalu G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karabacak A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sousounis K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim RT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nelson JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blair SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gilbert P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lopez NJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Courtemanche K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Froitzheim T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harake N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Savage AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jay S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wynn E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kidd MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tanaka EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tajer BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Payzin-Dogru D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Han J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luong AG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singer HD</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Optimized toolkit for the manipulation of immortalized axolotl fibroblasts.</name><description>The axolotl salamander model has broad utility for regeneration studies, but this model is limited by a lack of efficient cell-culture-based tools. The Axolotl Limb-1 (AL-1) fibroblast line, the only available immortalized axolotl cell line, was first published over 20 years ago, but many established molecular biology techniques, such as lipofectamine transfection, CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis, and antibiotic selection, work poorly or remain untested in AL-1 cells. Innovating technologies to manipulate AL-1 cells in culture and study their behavior following transplantation into the axolotl will complement in-vivo studies, decrease the number of animals used, and enable the faster, more streamlined investigation of regenerative biology questions. Here, we establish transfection, mutagenesis, an</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Aug</publication><modification>2026-06-04T01:34:15.767Z</modification><creation>2026-05-04T03:12:22.598Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12433595</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40187387</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.ymeth.2025.03.019</doi></cross_references></HashMap>