<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(9)</volume><submitter>Takagi Y</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To investigate the concordance between angle-closure assessments based on GS-1 gonioscope images and those obtained with anterior-segment optical coherence tomography.&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>Retrospective clinical study.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We included 33 patients (53 eyes) who visited Chukyo Eye Clinic during 2020-2024, were suspected of having angle closure, and underwent anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA2 Advance STAR Analyzer) and GS-1 examinations. The 16-directional images captured with the GS-1 were divided into two halves, creating 32 directions, which were rearranged to correspond with those obtained via anterior-segment optical coherence tomography. Agreement between evaluations was analyzed using Cohen's κ, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was evaluated. Anterior-segment optical coherence tomography images were manually corrected, and eyes with areas classified as "narrow" or "closed" were categorized as angle closure. With the GS-1, two glaucoma specialists independently reviewed the images. Areas in which the posterior trabecular meshwork was obscured in more than half of the image (Scheie classification grades III-IV) were judged indicative of angle closure.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We included 1,660 directions from 53 eyes in the agreement analysis. The proportion of directions judged as angle closure was 57.0% with anterior-segment optical coherence tomography and 46.1% with the GS-1. Cohen's κ for inter-test agreement was 0.173 (95% confidence interval: 0.128-0.218), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.588 (95% confidence interval: 0.561-0.615).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Analyses using anterior-segment optical coherence tomography yielded more frequent classifications of angle closure than evaluations based on GS-1 gonioscopic images.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pagination>e0332590</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12435641</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of angle-closure detection between automated gonioscopy and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12435641</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Takagi Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sakai Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yokoyama S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ichikawa K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morioka Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Asano R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of angle-closure detection between automated gonioscopy and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To investigate the concordance between angle-closure assessments based on GS-1 gonioscope images and those obtained with anterior-segment optical coherence tomography.&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>Retrospective clinical study.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We included 33 patients (53 eyes) who visited Chukyo Eye Clinic during 2020-2024, were suspected of having angle closure, and underwent anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA2 Advance STAR Analyzer) and GS-1 examinations. The 16-directional images captured with the GS-1 were divided into two halves, creating 32 directions, which were rearranged to correspond with those obtained via anterior-segment optical coherence tomography. Agreement between evaluations was analyzed using Cohen's κ, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was evaluated. Anterior-segment optical coherence tomography images were manually corrected, and eyes with areas classified as "narrow" or "closed" were categorized as angle closure. With the GS-1, two glaucoma specialists independently reviewed the images. Areas in which the posterior trabecular meshwork was obscured in more than half of the image (Scheie classification grades III-IV) were judged indicative of angle closure.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We included 1,660 directions from 53 eyes in the agreement analysis. The proportion of directions judged as angle closure was 57.0% with anterior-segment optical coherence tomography and 46.1% with the GS-1. Cohen's κ for inter-test agreement was 0.173 (95% confidence interval: 0.128-0.218), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.588 (95% confidence interval: 0.561-0.615).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Analyses using anterior-segment optical coherence tomography yielded more frequent classifications of angle closure than evaluations based on GS-1 gonioscopic images.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025</publication><modification>2026-06-01T14:04:00.296Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T13:16:34.618Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12435641</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40953048</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0332590</doi></cross_references></HashMap>