<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Menz BD</submitter><funding>Tour de Cure</funding><funding>Hospital Research Foundation</funding><funding>National Health and Medical Research Council</funding><pagination>2135-2145</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12439079</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>157(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Researchers at the EORTC recently recommended clinical thresholds for the QLQ-C30 to facilitate actionable insights in clinical practice. We evaluate the distribution of these thresholds and associations with outcomes in breast cancer. Data were pooled from two early-stage and six advanced-stage breast cancer trials. EORTC thresholds were applied to available QLQ-C30 data to identify clinically important PRO domains. Associations between the number of clinically important PRO domains at baseline with overall survival (OS), invasive-disease-free survival (IDFS), progression-free survival (PFS), grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs were evaluated using Cox-regression. Data from 8544 breast cancer patients, of whom 2428 (41%) of the 5893 early-stage and 1486 (56%) of the 2651 advanc</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of cancer</journal><pubmed_title>Patient-reported outcome thresholds and their associations with survival, adverse events, and quality of life in a pooled analysis of breast cancer trials.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12439079</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2023‐S‐DTFA‐005</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>APP2030913</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2023-S-DTFA-005</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>APP2008119</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RSP-117-FY2023</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RSP‐117‐FY2023</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Lyman GH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Menz BD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hopkins AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chan RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shahnam A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuderer NM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sorich MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rowland A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haseloff M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rammant E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramsey I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Modi ND</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vitry A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McKinnon RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abuhelwa AY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kichenadasse G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Swain SM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Patient-reported outcome thresholds and their associations with survival, adverse events, and quality of life in a pooled analysis of breast cancer trials.</name><description>Researchers at the EORTC recently recommended clinical thresholds for the QLQ-C30 to facilitate actionable insights in clinical practice. We evaluate the distribution of these thresholds and associations with outcomes in breast cancer. Data were pooled from two early-stage and six advanced-stage breast cancer trials. EORTC thresholds were applied to available QLQ-C30 data to identify clinically important PRO domains. Associations between the number of clinically important PRO domains at baseline with overall survival (OS), invasive-disease-free survival (IDFS), progression-free survival (PFS), grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs were evaluated using Cox-regression. Data from 8544 breast cancer patients, of whom 2428 (41%) of the 5893 early-stage and 1486 (56%) of the 2651 advanc</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Nov</publication><modification>2026-06-03T03:02:14.135Z</modification><creation>2026-04-23T03:13:52.726Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12439079</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40542609</pubmed><doi>10.1002/ijc.70020</doi></cross_references></HashMap>