{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["O'Halloran A"],"funding":["Dr. Maya Dewan was supported by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality","The Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative is supported by an unrestricted grant from Zoll","AHRQ HHS","Dr. Nadkarni is the PI for unrestricted research and educational grants to his institution from Zoll Medical, the Laerdal Foundation, and RQI Partners."],"pagination":["1102-1108"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12444532"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["18(12)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Systems to detect and respond to deteriorating hospitalized children are common despite little evidence supporting best practices. Our objective was to describe systems to detect/respond to deteriorating hospitalized children at Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative (pediRES-Q) institutions. We performed a cross-sectional survey of pediRES-Q leaders. Questionnaire design utilized expert validation and cognitive interviews. Thirty centers (88%) responded. Most (93%) used ≥1 system to detect deterioration: most commonly, early warning scores (83%), watcher lists (55%), and proactive surveillance teams (31%). Most (90%) had a team to respond to deteriorating patients and the majority of teams could be activated by clinician or family concerns. Most institutions (90%) collect relevant "],"journal":["Journal of hospital medicine"],"pubmed_title":["How do we detect and respond to clinical deterioration in hospitalized children? Results of the Pediatric Care BefOre Deterioration Events (CODE) survey."],"pmcid":["PMC12444532"],"funding_grant_id":["K08 HS026975","AHRQ K08HS026975"],"pubmed_authors":["Nadkarni V","Olson M","pediRES-Q Investigators","Ikeyama T","Buysse C","Sosa T","Lockwood J","Atkins D","Su F","Sutton R","Del Castillo J","Friess S","Hunt B","Mok YH","Watanabe I","Maxwell A","Villaescusa JU","Welsby D","Sen A","Christoff A","Tan G","deJong G","Braga MS","Dewan M","Gilleland J","Hanson C","Harvey H","Yeo A","Pirzadeh A","Tegtmeyer K","Tegg O","Sweberg T","Gangadharan S","Stromberg D","Corbett K","Yu P","Hayes J","Donoghue A","Raymond T","Harwayne-Gidansky I","Maa T","Abulebda K","Ranganathan A","Haskell S","Wolfe H","Heber K","Jani P","Lauridsen KG","Nett S","Wenger J","LaShoto D","Vidrine R","Griffis H","Skellet S","Berg M","Wratney A","Ong G","Topjian A","Cheng A","Masse E","DeCaen A","Gawronski O","Lemoine T","Berg R","Esangbedo I","Gray J","Mejia LM","Kleinman M","Knight L","Kurosawa H","Morgan R","DiMaria K","Roberts J","O'Halloran A","Balikai S"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"How do we detect and respond to clinical deterioration in hospitalized children? Results of the Pediatric Care BefOre Deterioration Events (CODE) survey.","description":"Systems to detect and respond to deteriorating hospitalized children are common despite little evidence supporting best practices. Our objective was to describe systems to detect/respond to deteriorating hospitalized children at Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative (pediRES-Q) institutions. We performed a cross-sectional survey of pediRES-Q leaders. Questionnaire design utilized expert validation and cognitive interviews. Thirty centers (88%) responded. Most (93%) used ≥1 system to detect deterioration: most commonly, early warning scores (83%), watcher lists (55%), and proactive surveillance teams (31%). Most (90%) had a team to respond to deteriorating patients and the majority of teams could be activated by clinician or family concerns. Most institutions (90%) collect relevant ","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Dec","modification":"2026-06-04T07:28:11.171Z","creation":"2026-06-04T03:05:43.891Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC12444532","cross_references":{"pubmed":["37861210"],"doi":["10.1002/jhm.13224"]}}