<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Chen Q</submitter><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>280-287</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12445016</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>643(8070)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Unique phosphorylation 'barcodes' installed in different regions of an active seven-transmembrane receptor by different G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) have been proposed to promote distinct cellular outcomes&lt;sup>1&lt;/sup>, but it is unclear whether or how arrestins differentially engage these barcodes. Here, to address this, we developed an antigen-binding fragment (Fab7) that recognizes both active arrestin2 (β-arrestin1) and arrestin3 (β-arrestin2) without interacting with bound receptor polypeptides. We used Fab7 to determine the structures of both arrestins in complex with atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) phosphorylated in different regions of its C-terminal tail by either GRK2 or GRK5 (ref. &lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>). The GRK2-phosphorylated ACKR3 resulted in more heterogeneous 'tail-mode' assemblies, whereas phosphorylation by GRK5 resulted in more rigid 'ACKR3-adjacent' assemblies. Unexpectedly, the finger loops of both arrestins engaged the micelle surface rather than the receptor intracellular pocket, with arrestin3 being more dynamic, partly because of its lack of a membrane-anchoring motif. Thus, both the region of the barcode and the arrestin isoform involved can alter the structure and dynamics of GPCR-arrestin complexes, providing a possible mechanistic basis for unique downstream cellular effects, such as the efficiency of chemokine scavenging and the robustness of arrestin binding in ACKR3.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nature</journal><pubmed_title>Effect of phosphorylation barcodes on arrestin binding to a chemokine receptor.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12445016</pmcid><funding_grant_id>F32 GM137505</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA023168</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 GM117372</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 GM133840</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AI161880</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL071818</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA254402</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R35 GM151033</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA221289</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kihara D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fuller JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lamme TD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Terashi G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Handel TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schafer CT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tesmer JJG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aydin Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gustavsson M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kossiakoff AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mukherjee S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tepper K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yao XQ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Agrawal P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of phosphorylation barcodes on arrestin binding to a chemokine receptor.</name><description>Unique phosphorylation 'barcodes' installed in different regions of an active seven-transmembrane receptor by different G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) have been proposed to promote distinct cellular outcomes&lt;sup>1&lt;/sup>, but it is unclear whether or how arrestins differentially engage these barcodes. Here, to address this, we developed an antigen-binding fragment (Fab7) that recognizes both active arrestin2 (β-arrestin1) and arrestin3 (β-arrestin2) without interacting with bound receptor polypeptides. We used Fab7 to determine the structures of both arrestins in complex with atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) phosphorylated in different regions of its C-terminal tail by either GRK2 or GRK5 (ref. &lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>). The GRK2-phosphorylated ACKR3 resulted in more heterogeneous 'tail-mode' assemblies, whereas phosphorylation by GRK5 resulted in more rigid 'ACKR3-adjacent' assemblies. Unexpectedly, the finger loops of both arrestins engaged the micelle surface rather than the receptor intracellular pocket, with arrestin3 being more dynamic, partly because of its lack of a membrane-anchoring motif. Thus, both the region of the barcode and the arrestin isoform involved can alter the structure and dynamics of GPCR-arrestin complexes, providing a possible mechanistic basis for unique downstream cellular effects, such as the efficiency of chemokine scavenging and the robustness of arrestin binding in ACKR3.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jul</publication><modification>2026-07-05T03:13:03.63Z</modification><creation>2026-07-05T03:08:31.878Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12445016</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40399676</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41586-025-09024-9</doi></cross_references></HashMap>