<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>73(9)</volume><submitter>Singh P</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1.25% pilocarpine compared to placebo for the treatment of presbyopia.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This multicenter, randomized, double-masked clinical trial compared pilocarpine 1.25% to placebo in presbyopic individuals aged 45-55 years, meeting standard near vision impairment criteria. Participants were randomized 1:1 using a computer-generated sequence, with identical, unmarked bottles ensuring masking. Distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) were assessed under mesopic and photopic conditions across multiple visits (days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30). The primary outcome was a ≥ 3-line gain in mesopic, high-contrast, binocular DCNVA at day 30, hour 3. Secondary outcomes included photopic a</pubmed_abstract><journal>Indian journal of ophthalmology</journal><pagination>1251-1257</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12448526</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Efficacy and safety of pilocarpine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution USP 1.25% w/v versus placebo ophthalmic solution for the treatment of presbyopia - A multicentric clinical trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12448526</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Datta A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nivean M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garasiya T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ajila V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sengupta S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Efficacy and safety of pilocarpine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution USP 1.25% w/v versus placebo ophthalmic solution for the treatment of presbyopia - A multicentric clinical trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1.25% pilocarpine compared to placebo for the treatment of presbyopia.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This multicenter, randomized, double-masked clinical trial compared pilocarpine 1.25% to placebo in presbyopic individuals aged 45-55 years, meeting standard near vision impairment criteria. Participants were randomized 1:1 using a computer-generated sequence, with identical, unmarked bottles ensuring masking. Distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) were assessed under mesopic and photopic conditions across multiple visits (days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30). The primary outcome was a ≥ 3-line gain in mesopic, high-contrast, binocular DCNVA at day 30, hour 3. Secondary outcomes included photopic a</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-07-12T03:16:09.449Z</modification><creation>2026-07-12T03:09:16.421Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12448526</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40880143</pubmed><doi>10.4103/IJO.IJO_680_25</doi></cross_references></HashMap>