<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>30(9)</volume><submitter>Blasco A</submitter><funding>GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance and objective&lt;/h4>Several definitions of efficacy endpoints have been proposed for clinical trials in early breast cancer (EBC). Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and other endpoints have been used as surrogates for overall survival (OS) in adjuvant trials. The aim was to evaluate these endpoints in a comparative way in a large cohort of patients to assess whether they are appropriate surrogates for OS.&lt;h4>Participants and design&lt;/h4>Individual patient data from 8 phase III randomized adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) trials for EBC were analyzed. Trial-level surrogacy analyses were conducted using weighted least squares regression to assess the association between treatment effects on surrogates at different time points-IDFS and other defined endpoints (by STEEP v2.0)-and OS. </pubmed_abstract><journal>The oncologist</journal><pagination>oyaf263</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12450318</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Intermediate endpoints as surrogates for long-term outcomes in breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy trials.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12450318</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Lopez-Tarruella S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Calvo L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chan A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Urruticoechea A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Saenz JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bermejo B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pienkowski T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruiz-Borrego M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Slamon D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Herranz J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spera G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guerrero-Zotano A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martin M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chap L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Crown J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Semiglazov V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carrasco E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blasco A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Intermediate endpoints as surrogates for long-term outcomes in breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy trials.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance and objective&lt;/h4>Several definitions of efficacy endpoints have been proposed for clinical trials in early breast cancer (EBC). Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and other endpoints have been used as surrogates for overall survival (OS) in adjuvant trials. The aim was to evaluate these endpoints in a comparative way in a large cohort of patients to assess whether they are appropriate surrogates for OS.&lt;h4>Participants and design&lt;/h4>Individual patient data from 8 phase III randomized adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) trials for EBC were analyzed. Trial-level surrogacy analyses were conducted using weighted least squares regression to assess the association between treatment effects on surrogates at different time points-IDFS and other defined endpoints (by STEEP v2.0)-and OS. </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-06-29T03:22:36.2Z</modification><creation>2026-06-29T03:19:47.522Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12450318</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40838872</pubmed><doi>10.1093/oncolo/oyaf263</doi></cross_references></HashMap>