<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Eid MA</submitter><funding>Society for Vascular Surgery</funding><funding>American College of Surgeons</funding><funding>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>2069-2078.e5</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12450360</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>82(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>The role of prophylactic carotid revascularization in asymptomatic patients aged ≥80 remains controversial. Current guidelines stipulate that asymptomatic older patients at "higher risk of stroke" on best medical therapy may still benefit from carotid intervention. Specifically, there is a widespread perception that a contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion may confer an increased anatomical stroke risk, thus creating a surgical dilemma, particularly among older patients. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether asymptomatic patients aged ≥80 years derive a stroke or survival benefit from prophylactic carotid revascularization in the setting of a contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We analyzed asymptomatic patients wi</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of vascular surgery</journal><pubmed_title>Surgical intervention among asymptomatic patients aged ≥80 with a contralateral carotid occlusion appears selectively warranted.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12450360</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K08 HL165087</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K08HL165087</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Neal D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huber TS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scali ST</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perry I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stone DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Columbo JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eid MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cooper MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Upchurch GR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Surgical intervention among asymptomatic patients aged ≥80 with a contralateral carotid occlusion appears selectively warranted.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>The role of prophylactic carotid revascularization in asymptomatic patients aged ≥80 remains controversial. Current guidelines stipulate that asymptomatic older patients at "higher risk of stroke" on best medical therapy may still benefit from carotid intervention. Specifically, there is a widespread perception that a contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion may confer an increased anatomical stroke risk, thus creating a surgical dilemma, particularly among older patients. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether asymptomatic patients aged ≥80 years derive a stroke or survival benefit from prophylactic carotid revascularization in the setting of a contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We analyzed asymptomatic patients wi</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-06T13:42:57.216Z</modification><creation>2026-05-31T03:09:32.986Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12450360</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40769462</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2025.07.051</doi></cross_references></HashMap>