<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>52(10)</volume><submitter>Auriac J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Manual segmentation of organs from PET/CT images is a time-consuming and highly operator-dependent task. Open software solutions are now available to automatically segment all major anatomical structures in CT images.&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>We compared the volumes and standardized uptake values (SUV) extracted from [18F]FDG-PET/CT patient scans for 33 anatomical structures segmented using two deep learning (DL) algorithms to determine if they are interchangeable.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Baseline [18F]FDG-PET/CT images were collected retrospectively for 315 women with metastatic breast cancer. A total of 33 anatomical volumes of interest (VOI) were segmented from the whole-body CT scans using both MOOSE v.3.0.14 and TotalSegmentator v.2.0.5 and copied onto the corresponding PET images. Fo</pubmed_abstract><journal>Medical physics</journal><pagination>e70025</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12460933</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of organ volumes and standardized uptake values in [18F]FDG-PET/CT images using MOOSE and TotalSegmentator to segment CT images.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12460933</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Buvat I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Orlhac F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Auriac J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jehanno N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nioche C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loisel C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beyer T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hovhannisyan-Baghdasarian N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seban RD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sundar LKS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of organ volumes and standardized uptake values in [18F]FDG-PET/CT images using MOOSE and TotalSegmentator to segment CT images.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Manual segmentation of organs from PET/CT images is a time-consuming and highly operator-dependent task. Open software solutions are now available to automatically segment all major anatomical structures in CT images.&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>We compared the volumes and standardized uptake values (SUV) extracted from [18F]FDG-PET/CT patient scans for 33 anatomical structures segmented using two deep learning (DL) algorithms to determine if they are interchangeable.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Baseline [18F]FDG-PET/CT images were collected retrospectively for 315 women with metastatic breast cancer. A total of 33 anatomical volumes of interest (VOI) were segmented from the whole-body CT scans using both MOOSE v.3.0.14 and TotalSegmentator v.2.0.5 and copied onto the corresponding PET images. Fo</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Oct</publication><modification>2026-06-03T20:17:00.283Z</modification><creation>2026-05-30T03:07:15.337Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12460933</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40993940</pubmed><doi>10.1002/mp.70025</doi></cross_references></HashMap>