<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Lo ETT</submitter><funding>Research Grants Council</funding><pagination>178</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12468528</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>High-ability students, despite their potential, may underachieve academically. The existing literature suggests the presence of subtypes, such as perfectionistic or creative high-ability students, who underachieve for different reasons. However, empirical work identifying these profiles and linking them to underachievement remains limited.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We analyzed self-reported data by 930 high-ability adolescents across Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom. We conducted a pre-registered confirmatory latent profile analysis on five dispositions theoretically relevant to underachievement: creativity, academic self-efficacy, self-regulation, perfectionistic standards, and self-criticism. We examined how these profiles related to underachievement ris</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education</journal><pubmed_title>Underachievement Risks and Profiles of Psychological Variables Among High-Ability Adolescents from Hong Kong, The Netherlands, Taiwan, and The United Kingdom.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12468528</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UGC/FDS16/H11/21</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Lo ETT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Weerdenburg M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoogeveen L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheung HN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jen E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chan SWY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sin KF</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Underachievement Risks and Profiles of Psychological Variables Among High-Ability Adolescents from Hong Kong, The Netherlands, Taiwan, and The United Kingdom.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>High-ability students, despite their potential, may underachieve academically. The existing literature suggests the presence of subtypes, such as perfectionistic or creative high-ability students, who underachieve for different reasons. However, empirical work identifying these profiles and linking them to underachievement remains limited.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We analyzed self-reported data by 930 high-ability adolescents across Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom. We conducted a pre-registered confirmatory latent profile analysis on five dispositions theoretically relevant to underachievement: creativity, academic self-efficacy, self-regulation, perfectionistic standards, and self-criticism. We examined how these profiles related to underachievement ris</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-01T03:22:17.484Z</modification><creation>2026-05-01T03:11:08.38Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12468528</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41002759</pubmed><doi>10.3390/ejihpe15090178</doi></cross_references></HashMap>