<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14(18)</volume><submitter>Muglu H</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Objectives:&lt;/b> The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs)-namely, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)-on survival outcomes and treatment responses in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving abiraterone (ABI) or enzalutamide (ENZA) therapy. &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> In this two-center retrospective observational study, researchers analyzed clinical data from 106 patients diagnosed with mCRPC. The cut-offs for NLR and PLR were determined to be 2.83 and 156, respectively, and their effects on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Changes in SIMs before and after ABI/ENZA treatment were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. &lt;b>Results:&lt;/b> Lower NLR (≤2.83) and PLR (≤156) were significantly associated with longer PFS and OS; however, in multivariate analysis, only high PLR emerged as an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS (HR: 2.01; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.026). Meanwhile, treatment response was an independent predictor of PFS, and no significant changes were observed in the mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), or platelet-large cell ratio (P-LCR) after treatment. &lt;b>Conclusions:&lt;/b> SIMs, such as NLR and especially PLR, may serve as practical and accessible tools for predicting survival in mCRPC patients; however, further prospective studies are warranted.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical medicine</journal><pagination>6536</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12470515</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The Prognostic Roles of Systemic Inflammatory Markers Before Abiraterone or Enzalutamide Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12470515</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Seker M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seker Can L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Acıkgoz O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamdard J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muglu H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yıldız O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bilici A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sunger E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olmez OF</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Prognostic Roles of Systemic Inflammatory Markers Before Abiraterone or Enzalutamide Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.</name><description>&lt;b>Objectives:&lt;/b> The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs)-namely, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)-on survival outcomes and treatment responses in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving abiraterone (ABI) or enzalutamide (ENZA) therapy. &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> In this two-center retrospective observational study, researchers analyzed clinical data from 106 patients diagnosed with mCRPC. The cut-offs for NLR and PLR were determined to be 2.83 and 156, respectively, and their effects on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Changes in SIMs before and after ABI/ENZA treatment were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. &lt;b>Results:&lt;/b> Lower NLR (≤2.83) and PLR (≤156) were significantly associated with longer PFS and OS; however, in multivariate analysis, only high PLR emerged as an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS (HR: 2.01; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.026). Meanwhile, treatment response was an independent predictor of PFS, and no significant changes were observed in the mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), or platelet-large cell ratio (P-LCR) after treatment. &lt;b>Conclusions:&lt;/b> SIMs, such as NLR and especially PLR, may serve as practical and accessible tools for predicting survival in mCRPC patients; however, further prospective studies are warranted.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-02T03:16:37.304Z</modification><creation>2026-05-02T03:11:28.921Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12470515</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41010740</pubmed><doi>10.3390/jcm14186536</doi></cross_references></HashMap>