<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Jen WY</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2451-2461</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12490727</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>207(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>MECOM rearrangements (MECOM-r) are acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)-defining, regardless of blast percentage or MECOM fusion partner. We sought to investigate if blast percentage or MECOM-r partner was associated with overall survival (OS). We included 152 adult patients with newly diagnosed MECOM-r and classified blast percentage into &lt;20% or ≥20% and MECOM-r partner into classic (GATA2::MECOM) or variant (others). Thirty-one per cent had &lt;20% blasts, with 69% having ≥20%; 57% had classic and 43% variant MECOM-r. Treatment was with intensive chemotherapy (IC) in 41% and low-intensity therapy (LIT) in 59%. Composite complete remission rates were similar between IC (50%) and LIT (48%, p = 0.99). The median OS was 17 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12-not estimable [NE]) for &lt;20% blasts, </pubmed_abstract><journal>British journal of haematology</journal><pubmed_title>MECOM fusion partner and bone marrow blast percentage influence outcomes of patients with MECOM rearranged acute myeloid leukaemia.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12490727</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA016672</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 CA100632</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA100632</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Sasaki K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Issa GC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pierce S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montalban-Bravo G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Manero G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kantarjian HM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kugler E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bataller A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loghavi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Daver NG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kadia TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Toruner GA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jen WY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bazinet A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Popat U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Short NJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jabbour E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhalla K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DiNardo CD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pemmaraju N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Croden J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bouligny IM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Borthakur G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ravandi F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>MECOM fusion partner and bone marrow blast percentage influence outcomes of patients with MECOM rearranged acute myeloid leukaemia.</name><description>MECOM rearrangements (MECOM-r) are acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)-defining, regardless of blast percentage or MECOM fusion partner. We sought to investigate if blast percentage or MECOM-r partner was associated with overall survival (OS). We included 152 adult patients with newly diagnosed MECOM-r and classified blast percentage into &lt;20% or ≥20% and MECOM-r partner into classic (GATA2::MECOM) or variant (others). Thirty-one per cent had &lt;20% blasts, with 69% having ≥20%; 57% had classic and 43% variant MECOM-r. Treatment was with intensive chemotherapy (IC) in 41% and low-intensity therapy (LIT) in 59%. Composite complete remission rates were similar between IC (50%) and LIT (48%, p = 0.99). The median OS was 17 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12-not estimable [NE]) for &lt;20% blasts, </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-06T13:36:26.558Z</modification><creation>2026-05-31T03:07:50.884Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12490727</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40983567</pubmed><doi>10.1111/bjh.70171</doi></cross_references></HashMap>