<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>27</volume><submitter>Dennstadt F</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Large language models (LLMs) hold promise for supporting clinical tasks, particularly in data-driven and technical disciplines such as radiation oncology. While prior evaluation studies have focused on examination-style settings for evaluating LLMs, their performance in real-life clinical scenarios remains unclear. In the future, LLMs might be used as general AI assistants to answer questions arising in clinical practice. It is unclear how well a modern LLM, locally executed within the infrastructure of a hospital, would answer such questions compared with clinical experts.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study aimed to assess the performance of a locally deployed, state-of-the-art medical LLM in answering real-world clinical questions in radiation oncology compared with clinical </pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of medical Internet research</journal><pagination>e69752</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12504895</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparative Evaluation of a Medical Large Language Model in Answering Real-World Radiation Oncology Questions: Multicenter Observational Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12504895</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Windisch P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haddad H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bachmann N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahmadsei M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aebersold DM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gkika E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hastings J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Putora PM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dennstadt F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rogers S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Glatzer M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoefler D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schmerder M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sinovcic D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bryjova K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maffei M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Christ SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mackeprang PH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gaio R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cihoric N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zwahlen D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riggenbach E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chiang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peeken J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riesterer O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mose L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Filchenko I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Putz F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparative Evaluation of a Medical Large Language Model in Answering Real-World Radiation Oncology Questions: Multicenter Observational Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Large language models (LLMs) hold promise for supporting clinical tasks, particularly in data-driven and technical disciplines such as radiation oncology. While prior evaluation studies have focused on examination-style settings for evaluating LLMs, their performance in real-life clinical scenarios remains unclear. In the future, LLMs might be used as general AI assistants to answer questions arising in clinical practice. It is unclear how well a modern LLM, locally executed within the infrastructure of a hospital, would answer such questions compared with clinical experts.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study aimed to assess the performance of a locally deployed, state-of-the-art medical LLM in answering real-world clinical questions in radiation oncology compared with clinical </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-06-04T09:01:27.27Z</modification><creation>2026-06-01T03:06:36.608Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12504895</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40986858</pubmed><doi>10.2196/69752</doi></cross_references></HashMap>