<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>40(1)</volume><submitter>Schena CA</submitter><funding>Università degli Studi di Ferrara</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR) has emerged as an effective technique for addressing rectal prolapse (RP) and associated pelvic floor disorders. However, variability persists regarding preoperative evaluation, patient selection, and procedural techniques. This Delphi consensus aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to standardize practice, enhance patient outcomes, and address key gaps in the literature.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Thirty-three experts in RVMR participated in a structured Delphi process. The panel addressed 10 key clinical questions, covering preoperative workup, surgical indications, procedural steps, learning curves, training, and RVMR outcomes. The consensus process was reached through iterative surveys, literature reviews, and a rigorous voting methodo</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of colorectal disease</journal><pagination>214</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12532664</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>2025 Delphi consensus on robotic ventral mesh rectopexy.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12532664</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Marotta A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marra AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Celentano V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bianchi PP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Italian Club of Robotic Surgery (ICORS), the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale (SICCR), and the Società Italiana Unitaria di ColoProctologia (SIUCP)</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Naldini G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marchegiani F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Azzolina D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>D'Hoore A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stuto A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tonsi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grossi U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carra MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ascanelli S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Masetti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Talento P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dall'Oco Tundo I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gallo G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coratti A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goglia M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Milone M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Braini A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martinez-Perez A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Simone V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martinello R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sileri P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pavone G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lenisa L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Da Pozzo F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Espin-Basany E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martellucci J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sani V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Genovese A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>La Greca G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khan J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adamina M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Testini M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Nardi P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de'Angelis N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pellino G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ratto C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schena CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bislenghi G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>2025 Delphi consensus on robotic ventral mesh rectopexy.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR) has emerged as an effective technique for addressing rectal prolapse (RP) and associated pelvic floor disorders. However, variability persists regarding preoperative evaluation, patient selection, and procedural techniques. This Delphi consensus aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to standardize practice, enhance patient outcomes, and address key gaps in the literature.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Thirty-three experts in RVMR participated in a structured Delphi process. The panel addressed 10 key clinical questions, covering preoperative workup, surgical indications, procedural steps, learning curves, training, and RVMR outcomes. The consensus process was reached through iterative surveys, literature reviews, and a rigorous voting methodo</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Oct</publication><modification>2026-06-04T14:32:38.397Z</modification><creation>2026-05-10T03:11:15.652Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12532664</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41099852</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00384-025-05003-8</doi></cross_references></HashMap>