<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(10)</volume><submitter>Alshammari AH</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Organismal biosensing leverages the olfactory acuity of living systems to detect volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associated with cancer, offering a low-cost and non-invasive complement to conventional diagnostics. Early studies demonstrate its feasibility across diverse platforms. In &lt;i>C. elegans&lt;/i>, chemotaxis assays on urine samples achieved sensitivities of 87-96% and specificities of 90-95% in case-control cohorts (n up to 242), while calcium imaging of AWC neurons distinguished breast cancer urine with ~97% accuracy in a small pilot cohort (n ≈ 40). Trained canines have identified prostate cancer from urine with sensitivities of ~71% and specificities of 70-76% (n ≈ 50), and AI-augmented canine breath platforms have reported accuracies of ~94-95% across ~1400 participants. Insects such as locusts and honeybees enable ultrafast neural decoding of VOCs, achieving 82-100% classification accuracy within 250 ms in pilot studies (n ≈ 20-30). Collectively, these platforms validate the principle that organismal behavior and neural activity encode cancer-related VOC signatures. However, limitations remain, including small cohorts, methodological heterogeneity, and reliance on binary outputs. This review proposes a Dual-Pathway Framework, where Pathway 1 leverages validated indices (e.g., the Chemotaxis Index) for high-throughput screening, and Pathway 2 applies machine learning to high-dimensional behavioral vectors for cancer subtyping, staging, and monitoring. By integrating these approaches, organismal biosensing could evolve from proof-of-concept assays into clinically scalable precision diagnostics.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Biomedicines</journal><pagination>2409</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12561682</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Beyond Binary: A Machine Learning Framework for Interpreting Organismal Behavior in Cancer Diagnostics.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12561682</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Mahdi MF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>di Luccio E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alshammari AH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morishita M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hatakeyama H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hirotsu T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Beyond Binary: A Machine Learning Framework for Interpreting Organismal Behavior in Cancer Diagnostics.</name><description>Organismal biosensing leverages the olfactory acuity of living systems to detect volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associated with cancer, offering a low-cost and non-invasive complement to conventional diagnostics. Early studies demonstrate its feasibility across diverse platforms. In &lt;i>C. elegans&lt;/i>, chemotaxis assays on urine samples achieved sensitivities of 87-96% and specificities of 90-95% in case-control cohorts (n up to 242), while calcium imaging of AWC neurons distinguished breast cancer urine with ~97% accuracy in a small pilot cohort (n ≈ 40). Trained canines have identified prostate cancer from urine with sensitivities of ~71% and specificities of 70-76% (n ≈ 50), and AI-augmented canine breath platforms have reported accuracies of ~94-95% across ~1400 participants. Insects such as locusts and honeybees enable ultrafast neural decoding of VOCs, achieving 82-100% classification accuracy within 250 ms in pilot studies (n ≈ 20-30). Collectively, these platforms validate the principle that organismal behavior and neural activity encode cancer-related VOC signatures. However, limitations remain, including small cohorts, methodological heterogeneity, and reliance on binary outputs. This review proposes a Dual-Pathway Framework, where Pathway 1 leverages validated indices (e.g., the Chemotaxis Index) for high-throughput screening, and Pathway 2 applies machine learning to high-dimensional behavioral vectors for cancer subtyping, staging, and monitoring. By integrating these approaches, organismal biosensing could evolve from proof-of-concept assays into clinically scalable precision diagnostics.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-14T03:19:37.988Z</modification><creation>2026-05-14T03:12:29.735Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12561682</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41153692</pubmed><doi>10.3390/biomedicines13102409</doi></cross_references></HashMap>