<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9</volume><submitter>Zamir MT</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into clinical diagnostics; yet, its lack of transparency hinders trust and adoption among health care professionals. The explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has the potential to improve the interpretability and reliability of AI-based decisions in clinical practice.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study evaluates the use of XAI for interpreting radiology reports to improve health care practitioners' confidence and comprehension of AI-assisted diagnostics.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study used the Indiana University chest x-ray dataset containing 3169 textual reports and 6471 images. Textual data were being classified as either normal or abnormal by using a range of machine learning approaches. This includes traditional m</pubmed_abstract><journal>JMIR formative research</journal><pagination>e77482</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12569488</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Explainable AI-Driven Analysis of Radiology Reports Using Text and Image Data: Experimental Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12569488</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Gelbukh I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zamir MT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Felipe Riveron EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khan SU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gelbukh A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Explainable AI-Driven Analysis of Radiology Reports Using Text and Image Data: Experimental Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into clinical diagnostics; yet, its lack of transparency hinders trust and adoption among health care professionals. The explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has the potential to improve the interpretability and reliability of AI-based decisions in clinical practice.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study evaluates the use of XAI for interpreting radiology reports to improve health care practitioners' confidence and comprehension of AI-assisted diagnostics.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study used the Indiana University chest x-ray dataset containing 3169 textual reports and 6471 images. Textual data were being classified as either normal or abnormal by using a range of machine learning approaches. This includes traditional m</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Oct</publication><modification>2026-06-05T06:57:45.752Z</modification><creation>2026-06-04T03:06:00.263Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12569488</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40997754</pubmed><doi>10.2196/77482</doi></cross_references></HashMap>