{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Cazzaniga G"],"funding":["Ministero della Salute","Ministero dell&apos;Università e della Ricerca"],"pagination":["798-804"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12573376"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["78(11)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Aim</h4>The digital transformation of the pathology laboratory is being continuously sustained by the introduction of innovative technologies promoting whole slide image (WSI)-based primary diagnosis. Here, we proposed a real-life benchmark of a pathology-dedicated medical monitor for the primary diagnosis of renal biopsies, evaluating the concordance between the 'traditional' microscope and commercial monitors using WSI from different scanners.<h4>Methods</h4>The College of American Pathologists WSI validation guidelines were used on 60 consecutive renal biopsies from three scanners (Aperio, 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu) using pathology-dedicated medical grade (MG), professional grade (PG) and consumer-off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors, comparing results with the microscope diagnosis after a 2"],"journal":["Journal of clinical pathology"],"pubmed_title":["Benchmarking digital displays (monitors) for histological diagnoses: the nephropathology use case."],"pmcid":["PMC12573376"],"funding_grant_id":["PNRR-MR1-2022-12375735","Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2023-2027 (l. 232/2016,","GR-2021-12374235"],"pubmed_authors":["Pagni F","Marletta S","Eccher A","Dei Tos AP","Mascadri F","Cazzaniga G","Gambaro G","Caputo A","L'Imperio V","Guidi G"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Benchmarking digital displays (monitors) for histological diagnoses: the nephropathology use case.","description":"<h4>Aim</h4>The digital transformation of the pathology laboratory is being continuously sustained by the introduction of innovative technologies promoting whole slide image (WSI)-based primary diagnosis. Here, we proposed a real-life benchmark of a pathology-dedicated medical monitor for the primary diagnosis of renal biopsies, evaluating the concordance between the 'traditional' microscope and commercial monitors using WSI from different scanners.<h4>Methods</h4>The College of American Pathologists WSI validation guidelines were used on 60 consecutive renal biopsies from three scanners (Aperio, 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu) using pathology-dedicated medical grade (MG), professional grade (PG) and consumer-off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors, comparing results with the microscope diagnosis after a 2","dates":{"release":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2025 Oct","modification":"2026-06-05T10:53:24.088Z","creation":"2026-06-05T03:06:46.59Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC12573376","cross_references":{"pubmed":["38538076"],"doi":["10.1136/jcp-2024-209418"]}}