<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Cazzaniga G</submitter><funding>Ministero della Salute</funding><funding>Ministero dell&amp;apos;Università e della Ricerca</funding><pagination>798-804</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12573376</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>78(11)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>The digital transformation of the pathology laboratory is being continuously sustained by the introduction of innovative technologies promoting whole slide image (WSI)-based primary diagnosis. Here, we proposed a real-life benchmark of a pathology-dedicated medical monitor for the primary diagnosis of renal biopsies, evaluating the concordance between the 'traditional' microscope and commercial monitors using WSI from different scanners.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The College of American Pathologists WSI validation guidelines were used on 60 consecutive renal biopsies from three scanners (Aperio, 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu) using pathology-dedicated medical grade (MG), professional grade (PG) and consumer-off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors, comparing results with the microscope diagnosis after a 2</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical pathology</journal><pubmed_title>Benchmarking digital displays (monitors) for histological diagnoses: the nephropathology use case.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12573376</pmcid><funding_grant_id>PNRR-MR1-2022-12375735</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2023-2027 (l. 232/2016,</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>GR-2021-12374235</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Pagni F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marletta S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eccher A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dei Tos AP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mascadri F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cazzaniga G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gambaro G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caputo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>L'Imperio V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guidi G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Benchmarking digital displays (monitors) for histological diagnoses: the nephropathology use case.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>The digital transformation of the pathology laboratory is being continuously sustained by the introduction of innovative technologies promoting whole slide image (WSI)-based primary diagnosis. Here, we proposed a real-life benchmark of a pathology-dedicated medical monitor for the primary diagnosis of renal biopsies, evaluating the concordance between the 'traditional' microscope and commercial monitors using WSI from different scanners.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The College of American Pathologists WSI validation guidelines were used on 60 consecutive renal biopsies from three scanners (Aperio, 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu) using pathology-dedicated medical grade (MG), professional grade (PG) and consumer-off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors, comparing results with the microscope diagnosis after a 2</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Oct</publication><modification>2026-06-05T10:53:24.088Z</modification><creation>2026-06-05T03:06:46.59Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12573376</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38538076</pubmed><doi>10.1136/jcp-2024-209418</doi></cross_references></HashMap>