<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8(6)</volume><submitter>Wu P</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To address algorithmic bias in clinical prediction models related to the timing of diagnosis, we evaluated the efficacy of mixture cure models that integrate time-to-event and binary classification frameworks to predict diagnoses.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a simulation and analyzed real-world North Carolina Medicaid data for children born in 2014, followed until 2023. The study evaluated traditional time-to-event and classification models against mixture cure models under scenarios with varied diagnostic timing and censoring.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Simulation results demonstrated that traditional models exhibit increased bias as diagnosis timing differences widened, whereas mixture cure models yielded unbiased estimates across varying censoring times. In real-wor</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMIA open</journal><pagination>ooaf148</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12598640</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Using mixture cure models to address algorithmic bias in diagnostic timing: autism as a test case.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12598640</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Engelhard MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goldstein BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davis NO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dawson G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Using mixture cure models to address algorithmic bias in diagnostic timing: autism as a test case.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To address algorithmic bias in clinical prediction models related to the timing of diagnosis, we evaluated the efficacy of mixture cure models that integrate time-to-event and binary classification frameworks to predict diagnoses.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a simulation and analyzed real-world North Carolina Medicaid data for children born in 2014, followed until 2023. The study evaluated traditional time-to-event and classification models against mixture cure models under scenarios with varied diagnostic timing and censoring.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Simulation results demonstrated that traditional models exhibit increased bias as diagnosis timing differences widened, whereas mixture cure models yielded unbiased estimates across varying censoring times. In real-wor</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-05T13:12:09.437Z</modification><creation>2026-05-17T03:13:05.416Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12598640</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41221373</pubmed><doi>10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf148</doi></cross_references></HashMap>