<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>27(11)</volume><submitter>Conti S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the optimal strategy during repeat ablation is not clear. This European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey aims to assess real-world ablation strategies in patients undergoing repeat AF ablation.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>A 25-item questionnaire was distributed among healthcare professionals via EHRA between 22 May and 21 June 2024. Of the 211 respondents from 43 countries, 58.1% of respondents planned a redo after multiple symptomatic recurrences of atrial arrhythmias. Most repeat procedures (68.0%) are performed within 3 months after the decision for re-intervention. 3D mapping and radiofrequency (RF) catheters with contact force (CF) sensing are the most common modality use</pubmed_abstract><journal>Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology</journal><pagination>euaf231</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12602869</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Contemporary strategies for repeat ablation of atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association survey.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12602869</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Anic A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Conti S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Providencia R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vlachos K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mills MT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heeger CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Penela D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karvonen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nesti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Conte G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Metzner A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruwald MH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roten L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zylla MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chun KJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Contemporary strategies for repeat ablation of atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association survey.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the optimal strategy during repeat ablation is not clear. This European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey aims to assess real-world ablation strategies in patients undergoing repeat AF ablation.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>A 25-item questionnaire was distributed among healthcare professionals via EHRA between 22 May and 21 June 2024. Of the 211 respondents from 43 countries, 58.1% of respondents planned a redo after multiple symptomatic recurrences of atrial arrhythmias. Most repeat procedures (68.0%) are performed within 3 months after the decision for re-intervention. 3D mapping and radiofrequency (RF) catheters with contact force (CF) sensing are the most common modality use</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Oct</publication><modification>2026-06-05T15:17:26.189Z</modification><creation>2026-05-18T03:13:11.029Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12602869</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40976578</pubmed><doi>10.1093/europace/euaf231</doi></cross_references></HashMap>