<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Dimmock S</submitter><funding>Leverhulme Trust</funding><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><funding>Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council</funding><funding>Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council</funding><pagination>RP102391</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12638045</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13</volume><pubmed_abstract>We can now collect cell-count data across whole animal brains quantifying recent neuronal activity, gene expression, or anatomical connectivity. This is a powerful approach since it is a multiregion measurement, but because the imaging is done postmortem, each animal only provides one set of counts. Experiments are expensive, and since cells are counted by imaging and aligning a large number of brain sections, they are time-intensive. The resulting datasets tend to be undersampled with fewer animals than brain regions. As a consequence, these data are a challenge for traditional statistical approaches. We present a 'standard' partially pooled Bayesian model for multiregion cell-count data and apply it to two example datasets. These examples demonstrate that hierarchical Bayesian methods ar</pubmed_abstract><journal>eLife</journal><pubmed_title>Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of multiregion brain cell count data.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12638045</pmcid><funding_grant_id>BB/L02134X/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RF-2021-533</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/S026630/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>206401/Z/17/Z</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>EP/W024020/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BB/R007020/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>EP/R513179/1</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Houghton CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Donnell C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schultz SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Exley BMS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Menage L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moore G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Warburton EC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dimmock S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Delogu A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of multiregion brain cell count data.</name><description>We can now collect cell-count data across whole animal brains quantifying recent neuronal activity, gene expression, or anatomical connectivity. This is a powerful approach since it is a multiregion measurement, but because the imaging is done postmortem, each animal only provides one set of counts. Experiments are expensive, and since cells are counted by imaging and aligning a large number of brain sections, they are time-intensive. The resulting datasets tend to be undersampled with fewer animals than brain regions. As a consequence, these data are a challenge for traditional statistical approaches. We present a 'standard' partially pooled Bayesian model for multiregion cell-count data and apply it to two example datasets. These examples demonstrate that hierarchical Bayesian methods ar</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Nov</publication><modification>2026-06-05T17:07:43.148Z</modification><creation>2026-05-19T03:12:03.578Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12638045</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41269881</pubmed><doi>10.7554/eLife.102391</doi></cross_references></HashMap>