<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Drosou M</submitter><funding>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding><funding>German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)</funding><funding>French National Research Agency</funding><pagination>e202500317</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12640672</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(22)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Paramagnetic molybdenum compounds are of great interest in inorganic chemistry and metalloenzyme catalysis. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopies that determine hyperfine coupling constants (HFCs) and g-tensor values are essential for investigating the electronic structure of these compounds, but require support from accurate quantum chemical approaches. Here, a database of Mo(V) complexes with well-defined structures and EPR parameters is presented, and optimal quantum chemical protocols for &lt;sup>95&lt;/sup>Mo HFCs and g-values are investigated. It is shown that unmodified segmented all- electron relativistically contracted (SARC) all-electron basis sets can produce converged results for HFCs and g-values with the exact-2-component (X2C) Hamiltonian. The dependence of EPR parameters on the functional is studied in detail. Double-hybrid functionals and global hybrids with high exact exchange are top performers for &lt;sup>95&lt;/sup>Mo HFCs, with PBE0-DH achieving the best agreement with experiment. Comparison of density functional theory (DFT)-derived HFCs with values obtained by coupled cluster theory with the domain-based local pair natural orbital approach (DLPNO-CCSD) shows that DFT remains the method of choice for the present set of compounds. Smaller differentiation among functionals is observed for g-tensors, although PBE0-DH is still a top performer and can be recommended as the most reliable approach overall for describing both valence and core properties of Mo compounds.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry</journal><pubmed_title>Accurate Calculation of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Parameters for Molybdenum Compounds.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12640672</pmcid><funding_grant_id>57445526</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ANR-19-CE05_0030_01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ANR-18 CE092_0040_01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ANR‐18 CE092_0040_01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ANR‐19‐CE05_0030_01</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Pantazis DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Orio M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wehrung I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Drosou M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Accurate Calculation of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Parameters for Molybdenum Compounds.</name><description>Paramagnetic molybdenum compounds are of great interest in inorganic chemistry and metalloenzyme catalysis. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopies that determine hyperfine coupling constants (HFCs) and g-tensor values are essential for investigating the electronic structure of these compounds, but require support from accurate quantum chemical approaches. Here, a database of Mo(V) complexes with well-defined structures and EPR parameters is presented, and optimal quantum chemical protocols for &lt;sup>95&lt;/sup>Mo HFCs and g-values are investigated. It is shown that unmodified segmented all- electron relativistically contracted (SARC) all-electron basis sets can produce converged results for HFCs and g-values with the exact-2-component (X2C) Hamiltonian. The dependence of EPR parameters on the functional is studied in detail. Double-hybrid functionals and global hybrids with high exact exchange are top performers for &lt;sup>95&lt;/sup>Mo HFCs, with PBE0-DH achieving the best agreement with experiment. Comparison of density functional theory (DFT)-derived HFCs with values obtained by coupled cluster theory with the domain-based local pair natural orbital approach (DLPNO-CCSD) shows that DFT remains the method of choice for the present set of compounds. Smaller differentiation among functionals is observed for g-tensors, although PBE0-DH is still a top performer and can be recommended as the most reliable approach overall for describing both valence and core properties of Mo compounds.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Nov</publication><modification>2026-06-05T18:47:36.639Z</modification><creation>2026-05-20T03:13:52.803Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12640672</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41100870</pubmed><doi>10.1002/cphc.202500317</doi></cross_references></HashMap>