<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(4)</volume><submitter>Fonte C</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Cognitive impairment after stroke often reduces independence and quality of life. Cognitive rehabilitation is therefore essential, and recent research on computer-based interventions has shown promising results. This proof-of-concept study investigated the effects of additional self-administered cognitive training using an electronic device, compared with traditional paper-and-pencil methods, on attentional functions in individuals with subacute stroke.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group. For two consecutive weeks, both groups received forty-five-minute, face-to-face cognitive therapy sessions each morning, delivered via an electronic device. In addition, the experimental group engaged in sixty minutes of self-administered cognitive training using the same device, while the control group completed conventional exercises with paper-and-pencil tools. Neuropsychological assessments were conducted before and after the intervention.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Twenty-three participants were included (experimental group: eleven; control group: twelve). No significant differences in safety or attentional performance were observed between groups. Within-group analyses showed improvements in the experimental group in attentional shifting, inhibitory control, visuospatial planning, and problem-solving, while the control group improved in visuospatial planning and problem-solving.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>These preliminary findings suggest that self-administered electronic cognitive training may be a feasible approach to support attentional recovery in individuals with subacute stroke.</pubmed_abstract><journal>NeuroSci</journal><pagination>109</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12642014</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Self-Administered Cognitive Rehabilitation Using an Electronic Device in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Proof-of-Concept Study on Safety, Feasibility, and Preliminary Efficacy.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12642014</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Damora A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smania N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gallinaro Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Varalta V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rotundo G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Picelli A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fonte C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abbruzzese L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Evangelista E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mancuso M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Self-Administered Cognitive Rehabilitation Using an Electronic Device in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Proof-of-Concept Study on Safety, Feasibility, and Preliminary Efficacy.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Cognitive impairment after stroke often reduces independence and quality of life. Cognitive rehabilitation is therefore essential, and recent research on computer-based interventions has shown promising results. This proof-of-concept study investigated the effects of additional self-administered cognitive training using an electronic device, compared with traditional paper-and-pencil methods, on attentional functions in individuals with subacute stroke.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group. For two consecutive weeks, both groups received forty-five-minute, face-to-face cognitive therapy sessions each morning, delivered via an electronic device. In addition, the experimental group engaged in sixty minutes of self-administered cognitive training using the same device, while the control group completed conventional exercises with paper-and-pencil tools. Neuropsychological assessments were conducted before and after the intervention.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Twenty-three participants were included (experimental group: eleven; control group: twelve). No significant differences in safety or attentional performance were observed between groups. Within-group analyses showed improvements in the experimental group in attentional shifting, inhibitory control, visuospatial planning, and problem-solving, while the control group improved in visuospatial planning and problem-solving.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>These preliminary findings suggest that self-administered electronic cognitive training may be a feasible approach to support attentional recovery in individuals with subacute stroke.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Oct</publication><modification>2026-06-05T03:07:58.222Z</modification><creation>2026-06-05T03:06:32.188Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12642014</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41283298</pubmed><doi>10.3390/neurosci6040109</doi></cross_references></HashMap>