{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["43(12)"],"submitter":["Araki S"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objectives</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison to low-tube-potential CCTA using energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), with a specific focus on the evaluation of coronary stents.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This retrospective study included 54 patients (88 stents) who underwent CCTA in UHR mode on PCD-CT at low tube potential (PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low; 27 patients [45 stents]) or CCTA with EID-CT at low tube potential (EID-low; 27 patients [43 stents]). The EID-low cohort was selected by propensity score matching to the PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low cohort. Image quality of in-stent lumen was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, with a score o"],"journal":["Japanese journal of radiology"],"pagination":["1981-1992"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12647213"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution coronary CTA with photon-counting detector CT for stent evaluation: a comparative feasibility study."],"pmcid":["PMC12647213"],"pubmed_authors":["Ichikawa Y","Kitagawa K","Araki S","Okabe S","Takafuji M","Sakuma H","Nakamura S"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution coronary CTA with photon-counting detector CT for stent evaluation: a comparative feasibility study.","description":"<h4>Objectives</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison to low-tube-potential CCTA using energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), with a specific focus on the evaluation of coronary stents.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This retrospective study included 54 patients (88 stents) who underwent CCTA in UHR mode on PCD-CT at low tube potential (PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low; 27 patients [45 stents]) or CCTA with EID-CT at low tube potential (EID-low; 27 patients [43 stents]). The EID-low cohort was selected by propensity score matching to the PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low cohort. Image quality of in-stent lumen was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, with a score o","dates":{"release":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2025 Dec","modification":"2026-06-05T16:45:55.643Z","creation":"2026-05-18T03:13:15.358Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC12647213","cross_references":{"pubmed":["40782242"],"doi":["10.1007/s11604-025-01846-x"]}}