<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>43(12)</volume><submitter>Araki S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison to low-tube-potential CCTA using energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), with a specific focus on the evaluation of coronary stents.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>This retrospective study included 54 patients (88 stents) who underwent CCTA in UHR mode on PCD-CT at low tube potential (PCD&lt;sub>UHR&lt;/sub>-low; 27 patients [45 stents]) or CCTA with EID-CT at low tube potential (EID-low; 27 patients [43 stents]). The EID-low cohort was selected by propensity score matching to the PCD&lt;sub>UHR&lt;/sub>-low cohort. Image quality of in-stent lumen was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, with a score o</pubmed_abstract><journal>Japanese journal of radiology</journal><pagination>1981-1992</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12647213</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution coronary CTA with photon-counting detector CT for stent evaluation: a comparative feasibility study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12647213</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ichikawa Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kitagawa K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Araki S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Okabe S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takafuji M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sakuma H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakamura S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution coronary CTA with photon-counting detector CT for stent evaluation: a comparative feasibility study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison to low-tube-potential CCTA using energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), with a specific focus on the evaluation of coronary stents.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>This retrospective study included 54 patients (88 stents) who underwent CCTA in UHR mode on PCD-CT at low tube potential (PCD&lt;sub>UHR&lt;/sub>-low; 27 patients [45 stents]) or CCTA with EID-CT at low tube potential (EID-low; 27 patients [43 stents]). The EID-low cohort was selected by propensity score matching to the PCD&lt;sub>UHR&lt;/sub>-low cohort. Image quality of in-stent lumen was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, with a score o</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-05T16:45:55.643Z</modification><creation>2026-05-18T03:13:15.358Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12647213</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40782242</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s11604-025-01846-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>