<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Xie L</submitter><funding>Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (Beijing Natural Science Foundation)</funding><pagination>10473</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12647724</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma carries a poor prognosis after standard chemotherapy. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial (NCT05277480) to compare apatinib plus ifosfamide/etoposide (IE) with IE alone in patients who had progressed following at least one prior line of chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive apatinib (500 mg orally once daily) plus IE (ifosfamide 1.8 g/m²/day and etoposide 100 mg/m²/day, days 1-3 every 3 weeks) or IE alone (same doses, days 1-5 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Between April 14, 2022, and August 22, 2023, 81 patients were enrolled (53 in apatinib plus IE group and 28 in IE group). After a median follow-up of 19.9 months, the median PFS was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9, 6.4) with apatinib plus IE compared with 3.4 months (95% CI: 1.4, 4.6) with IE (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.98; P = 0.0402). The trial met its pre-specified primary endpoint. These results suggest that apatinib plus IE may improve PFS in relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma, but as a randomized phase II study, the findings are exploratory and require confirmation in phase III trials.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nature communications</journal><pubmed_title>Apatinib plus ifosfamide and etoposide versus ifosfamide and etoposide in patients with advanced osteosarcomas (OAIE/PKUPH-sarcoma 11): a randomized phase II study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12647724</pmcid><funding_grant_id>L234041</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hua Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guo W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xie L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pang Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sun X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ji T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wei R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sun K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shao S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang X</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Apatinib plus ifosfamide and etoposide versus ifosfamide and etoposide in patients with advanced osteosarcomas (OAIE/PKUPH-sarcoma 11): a randomized phase II study.</name><description>Relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma carries a poor prognosis after standard chemotherapy. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial (NCT05277480) to compare apatinib plus ifosfamide/etoposide (IE) with IE alone in patients who had progressed following at least one prior line of chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive apatinib (500 mg orally once daily) plus IE (ifosfamide 1.8 g/m²/day and etoposide 100 mg/m²/day, days 1-3 every 3 weeks) or IE alone (same doses, days 1-5 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Between April 14, 2022, and August 22, 2023, 81 patients were enrolled (53 in apatinib plus IE group and 28 in IE group). After a median follow-up of 19.9 months, the median PFS was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9, 6.4) with apatinib plus IE compared with 3.4 months (95% CI: 1.4, 4.6) with IE (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.98; P = 0.0402). The trial met its pre-specified primary endpoint. These results suggest that apatinib plus IE may improve PFS in relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma, but as a randomized phase II study, the findings are exploratory and require confirmation in phase III trials.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Nov</publication><modification>2026-06-05T16:48:56.841Z</modification><creation>2026-05-18T03:13:33.353Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12647724</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41290609</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41467-025-65467-8</doi></cross_references></HashMap>