<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(12)</volume><submitter>Nama N</submitter><funding>American Academy of Pediatrics/Resident Research Grant Program 2021</funding><funding>Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation</funding><funding>Seattle Children's Research Institute/Career Development Award 2023-2026</funding><funding>University of Calgary</funding><funding>American Academy of Pediatrics</funding><funding>BC Children's Hospital/Early Investigator Seeds Grant 2022</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Guidelines on Brief Resolved Unexplained Event (BRUE) only provide recommendations for infants categorized at lower risk. However, most infants fall into the higher-risk category, leaving management decisions to individual clinicians and contributing to variation in care.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Describe interhospital variation in BRUE management and determine whether higher resource utilization improves detection of serious underlying diagnoses.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This multicenter observational cohort (2017-2021) included infants (&lt; 12 months) with BRUE at eight Canadian hospitals. We recorded admission, and use of electrocardiograms (ECG), electroencephalograms (EEG), antibiotic and anti-reflux medications, and subspecialty consultations. Multivariable median regression evaluate</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of hospital medicine</journal><pagination>1297-1305</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12666994</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Interhospital variation in the management of Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUE) in infants: A Canadian multicenter cohort study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12666994</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Picco K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Foulds JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bone JN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kanani R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holland J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Parisien B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quet J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gagnon JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tieder JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kyrychenko P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gill PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coon E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sehgal A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nama N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Canadian BRUE Collaboration (C‐BRUE‐C) and the Canadian Paediatric Inpatient Research Network (PIRN)</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goldman RD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Donlan M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Novak C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mahant S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Interhospital variation in the management of Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUE) in infants: A Canadian multicenter cohort study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Guidelines on Brief Resolved Unexplained Event (BRUE) only provide recommendations for infants categorized at lower risk. However, most infants fall into the higher-risk category, leaving management decisions to individual clinicians and contributing to variation in care.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Describe interhospital variation in BRUE management and determine whether higher resource utilization improves detection of serious underlying diagnoses.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This multicenter observational cohort (2017-2021) included infants (&lt; 12 months) with BRUE at eight Canadian hospitals. We recorded admission, and use of electrocardiograms (ECG), electroencephalograms (EEG), antibiotic and anti-reflux medications, and subspecialty consultations. Multivariable median regression evaluate</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-05T21:52:16.542Z</modification><creation>2026-05-22T03:15:54.436Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12666994</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40571996</pubmed><doi>10.1002/jhm.70094</doi></cross_references></HashMap>