<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21(1)</volume><submitter>Luo J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>The APOLLO trial demonstrated that anlotinib plus penpulimab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this regimen from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. We constructed a partitioned survival model comprising three health states to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anlotinib plus penpulimab versus sorafenib for unresectable HCC. Over a 10-y time horizon, we compared the total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) between two groups. The robustness of the results was validated through one-way sens</pubmed_abstract><journal>Human vaccines &amp; immunotherapeutics</journal><pagination>2582294</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12674322</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib plus penpulimab versus sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12674322</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Gui C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Du Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luo J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib plus penpulimab versus sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.</name><description>The APOLLO trial demonstrated that anlotinib plus penpulimab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this regimen from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. We constructed a partitioned survival model comprising three health states to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anlotinib plus penpulimab versus sorafenib for unresectable HCC. Over a 10-y time horizon, we compared the total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) between two groups. The robustness of the results was validated through one-way sens</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-07-16T07:26:22.717Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T10:43:55.894Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12674322</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41326976</pubmed><doi>10.1080/21645515.2025.2582294</doi></cross_references></HashMap>