<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>7(12)</volume><submitter>Abbas GH</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>This systematic review evaluates artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive models developed for early sepsis detection in adult hospitalized patients. It explores model types, input features, validation strategies, performance metrics, clinical integration, and implementation challenges.&lt;h4>Data sources&lt;/h4>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL for studies published between January 2015 and March 2025.&lt;h4>Study selection&lt;/h4>Eligible studies included those developing or validating AI models for adult inpatient sepsis prediction using electronic health record data and reporting at least one performance metric (area under the curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, or F1 score). Studies focusing on pediatric</pubmed_abstract><journal>Critical care explorations</journal><pagination>e1360</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12685403</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Artificial Intelligence-Based Predictive Modeling for Early Detection of Sepsis in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12685403</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Giri OA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khan NH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abbas GH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sen P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Artificial Intelligence-Based Predictive Modeling for Early Detection of Sepsis in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>This systematic review evaluates artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive models developed for early sepsis detection in adult hospitalized patients. It explores model types, input features, validation strategies, performance metrics, clinical integration, and implementation challenges.&lt;h4>Data sources&lt;/h4>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL for studies published between January 2015 and March 2025.&lt;h4>Study selection&lt;/h4>Eligible studies included those developing or validating AI models for adult inpatient sepsis prediction using electronic health record data and reporting at least one performance metric (area under the curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, or F1 score). Studies focusing on pediatric</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-07T04:52:01.822Z</modification><creation>2026-06-07T03:05:54.264Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12685403</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41348160</pubmed><doi>10.1097/CCE.0000000000001360</doi></cross_references></HashMap>