{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["5(5)"],"submitter":["Samaha JN"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Achieving excellent recanalization (Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c/3) in fewer attempts improves clinical outcomes. Previous studies suggest that switching techniques after a failed first pass may enhance reperfusion rates. This study evaluates whether technique switching improves subsequent reperfusion in a large multicenter registry.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed retrospective and prospective SVIN (Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology) registry data from 12 US centers (October 2014-December 2021) involving endovascular therapy for M1 or internal carotid artery-terminus (ICA-T) occlusions. Patients with at least 2 recanalization attempts using stent retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined technique (CT) were included. Primary outco"],"journal":["Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)"],"pagination":["e001797"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12697647"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Endovascular Thrombectomy Technique Optimization: A SVIN Registry Analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC12697647"],"pubmed_authors":["Iyyangar AS","Abdelhakim N","Miller SE","Zhang L","Abdalkader M","Haussen DC","Al-Bayati AR","Liebeskind DS","Dolia J","Hassan AE","Nguyen TN","Sugg RM","Nogueira RG","Azeem H","Sheth SA","Jumaa MA","Bajaj R","Linares G","Dabus G","Majidi S","Mehta BP","Fifi JT","Khalife J","Mohammaden M","Reddi P","Koneru M","Grossberg JA","Sessa J","Tekle WG","Ortega-Gutierrez S","Galecio-Castillo M","Cespedes J","Saei HM","Linfante I","Le NM","Samaha JN"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Endovascular Thrombectomy Technique Optimization: A SVIN Registry Analysis.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Achieving excellent recanalization (Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c/3) in fewer attempts improves clinical outcomes. Previous studies suggest that switching techniques after a failed first pass may enhance reperfusion rates. This study evaluates whether technique switching improves subsequent reperfusion in a large multicenter registry.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed retrospective and prospective SVIN (Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology) registry data from 12 US centers (October 2014-December 2021) involving endovascular therapy for M1 or internal carotid artery-terminus (ICA-T) occlusions. Patients with at least 2 recanalization attempts using stent retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined technique (CT) were included. Primary outco","dates":{"release":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2025 Sep","modification":"2026-06-06T21:51:21.649Z","creation":"2026-06-05T03:11:48.09Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC12697647","cross_references":{"pubmed":["41573331"],"doi":["10.1161/SVIN.125.001797"]}}