<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>5(5)</volume><submitter>Samaha JN</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Achieving excellent recanalization (Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c/3) in fewer attempts improves clinical outcomes. Previous studies suggest that switching techniques after a failed first pass may enhance reperfusion rates. This study evaluates whether technique switching improves subsequent reperfusion in a large multicenter registry.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We analyzed retrospective and prospective SVIN (Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology) registry data from 12 US centers (October 2014-December 2021) involving endovascular therapy for M1 or internal carotid artery-terminus (ICA-T) occlusions. Patients with at least 2 recanalization attempts using stent retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined technique (CT) were included. Primary outco</pubmed_abstract><journal>Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)</journal><pagination>e001797</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12697647</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Endovascular Thrombectomy Technique Optimization: A SVIN Registry Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12697647</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Iyyangar AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdelhakim N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miller SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdalkader M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haussen DC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Al-Bayati AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liebeskind DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dolia J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hassan AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nguyen TN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sugg RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nogueira RG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Azeem H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sheth SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jumaa MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bajaj R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Linares G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dabus G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Majidi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mehta BP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fifi JT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khalife J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mohammaden M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reddi P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koneru M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grossberg JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sessa J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tekle WG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ortega-Gutierrez S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galecio-Castillo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cespedes J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saei HM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Linfante I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le NM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Samaha JN</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Endovascular Thrombectomy Technique Optimization: A SVIN Registry Analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Achieving excellent recanalization (Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c/3) in fewer attempts improves clinical outcomes. Previous studies suggest that switching techniques after a failed first pass may enhance reperfusion rates. This study evaluates whether technique switching improves subsequent reperfusion in a large multicenter registry.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We analyzed retrospective and prospective SVIN (Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology) registry data from 12 US centers (October 2014-December 2021) involving endovascular therapy for M1 or internal carotid artery-terminus (ICA-T) occlusions. Patients with at least 2 recanalization attempts using stent retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined technique (CT) were included. Primary outco</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-06-06T21:51:21.649Z</modification><creation>2026-06-05T03:11:48.09Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12697647</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41573331</pubmed><doi>10.1161/SVIN.125.001797</doi></cross_references></HashMap>