<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>31(11)</volume><submitter>Hero E</submitter><pubmed_abstract>By using PCR testing, we found Neoehrlichia mikurensis DNA in 1.1% of ticks removed from persons in Sweden and Finland. Symptoms developed in 2 immunocompetent persons. Despite low transmission risk, infection can occur after short tick attachment. Our findings highlight the need to consider N. mikurensis in patients with unexplained symptoms after tick bite.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Emerging infectious diseases</journal><pagination>2149-2152</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12704533</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Ticks and Tick-Bitten Persons, Sweden and Finland, 2008-2009.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12704533</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Forsberg P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Henningsson AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lindgren PE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lager M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wilhelmsson P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hero E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Ticks and Tick-Bitten Persons, Sweden and Finland, 2008-2009.</name><description>By using PCR testing, we found Neoehrlichia mikurensis DNA in 1.1% of ticks removed from persons in Sweden and Finland. Symptoms developed in 2 immunocompetent persons. Despite low transmission risk, infection can occur after short tick attachment. Our findings highlight the need to consider N. mikurensis in patients with unexplained symptoms after tick bite.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Nov</publication><modification>2026-06-07T05:04:40.515Z</modification><creation>2026-06-07T03:06:49.624Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12704533</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41379630</pubmed><doi>10.3201/eid3111.241850</doi></cross_references></HashMap>