<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>40(6)</volume><submitter>Edwards G</submitter><funding>Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship</funding><pubmed_abstract>Despite their conceptual similarities and importance for effective health management, the relationship between health literacy and eHealth literacy remains poorly understood. This systematic review investigated the statistical association between health literacy and eHealth literacy in adults, along with study-level moderators and biopsychosocial correlates. CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, ProQuest, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched until January 2025. Methodological reporting quality (QualSyst Checklist) was assessed and between-study heterogeneity explored using random and mixed-effects modeling. Twenty-three observational studies (N = 25 505 participants), all characterized by high methodological quality, were included. A weak positive relationship between overall health litera</pubmed_abstract><journal>Health promotion international</journal><pagination>daaf217</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12705269</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Examining the relationship between health literacy and eHealth literacy in adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12705269</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Oxlad M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Edwards G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dorstyn D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Examining the relationship between health literacy and eHealth literacy in adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>Despite their conceptual similarities and importance for effective health management, the relationship between health literacy and eHealth literacy remains poorly understood. This systematic review investigated the statistical association between health literacy and eHealth literacy in adults, along with study-level moderators and biopsychosocial correlates. CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, ProQuest, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched until January 2025. Methodological reporting quality (QualSyst Checklist) was assessed and between-study heterogeneity explored using random and mixed-effects modeling. Twenty-three observational studies (N = 25 505 participants), all characterized by high methodological quality, were included. A weak positive relationship between overall health litera</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Oct</publication><modification>2026-06-07T05:11:11.381Z</modification><creation>2026-06-07T03:06:49.267Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12705269</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41398315</pubmed><doi>10.1093/heapro/daaf217</doi></cross_references></HashMap>