<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Gore JL</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute</funding><pagination>274-285</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12707586</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>44(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To compare patient-reported and clinical outcomes between radical cystectomy (RC) and bladder-sparing therapy (BST) in patients with recurrent high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>This pragmatic, prospective observational cohort study was designed with patients, who selected and prioritized outcomes. Eligible adults were candidates for both RC or BST, had previous induction Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and received their last treatment within 12 months. The primary outcome was the EORTC-QLQ-C30 physical function scale at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included other EORTC-QLQ-C30 scales, depression, anxiety, bladder cancer-specific quality of life (QOL), financial burden, and cancer-specific outcomes. Targeted maximum likeliho</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Twelve-Month Results From the CISTO Study Comparing Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Recurrent High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12707586</pmcid><funding_grant_id>PCS-2017C3-9380</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR002319</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Master VA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shore ND</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Catto JWF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rios P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jun G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lotan Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nepple KG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roscoe LA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Woldu SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chisolm S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tyson MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steinberg GD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scarpato KR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Porten SP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ritch CR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chamie K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garg T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pohar KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kessler LG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>MacLean DB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peyton CC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riggs SB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kamat AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davicioni E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Modi PK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bassett JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kates MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Comstock BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith AB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee EK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bivalacqua TJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Daneshmand S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sankin A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wright JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ballard Murray MB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montgomery JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Almeida F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yano M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen DYT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morris DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nefcy C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>CISTO Collaborative group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nix JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Neil BB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gilbert SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sachse K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oliver RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Basu A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heagerty PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guzzo TJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malin JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Westerman ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dickstein R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gadzinski AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lindsey N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nash MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Macleod LC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolff EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kukreja JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lipman R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taylor JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Follmer KM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mansour AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lane BR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gore JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mossanen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Downs TM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Twelve-Month Results From the CISTO Study Comparing Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Recurrent High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To compare patient-reported and clinical outcomes between radical cystectomy (RC) and bladder-sparing therapy (BST) in patients with recurrent high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>This pragmatic, prospective observational cohort study was designed with patients, who selected and prioritized outcomes. Eligible adults were candidates for both RC or BST, had previous induction Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and received their last treatment within 12 months. The primary outcome was the EORTC-QLQ-C30 physical function scale at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included other EORTC-QLQ-C30 scales, depression, anxiety, bladder cancer-specific quality of life (QOL), financial burden, and cancer-specific outcomes. Targeted maximum likeliho</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Feb</publication><modification>2026-06-12T10:19:45.327Z</modification><creation>2026-06-12T03:12:00.695Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12707586</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41397208</pubmed><doi>10.1200/JCO-25-01324</doi></cross_references></HashMap>