<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>228(1)</volume><submitter>Kerber A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Decades of research on the dimensional nature of personality disorder have led to the replacement of categorical personality disorder diagnoses by a dimensional assessment of personality disorder severity (PDS) in ICD-11, which essentially corresponds to personality functioning in the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. Besides advancing the focus in the diagnosis of PD on impairments in self- and interpersonal functioning, this shift also urges clinicians and researchers worldwide to get familiar with new diagnostic approaches.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>This study investigated which PDS dimensions among different assessment methods and conceptualisations have the most predictive value for overall PDS.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Using semi-structured interviews and self-reports of p</pubmed_abstract><journal>The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science</journal><pagination>46-54</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12722010</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Determining essential dimensions for the clinical approximation of personality disorder severity: multi-method study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12722010</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Macina C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Busch O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Knaevelsrud C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kerber A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wrege J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kampe L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ohse L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rentrop M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Horz-Sagstetter S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Determining essential dimensions for the clinical approximation of personality disorder severity: multi-method study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Decades of research on the dimensional nature of personality disorder have led to the replacement of categorical personality disorder diagnoses by a dimensional assessment of personality disorder severity (PDS) in ICD-11, which essentially corresponds to personality functioning in the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. Besides advancing the focus in the diagnosis of PD on impairments in self- and interpersonal functioning, this shift also urges clinicians and researchers worldwide to get familiar with new diagnostic approaches.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>This study investigated which PDS dimensions among different assessment methods and conceptualisations have the most predictive value for overall PDS.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Using semi-structured interviews and self-reports of p</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Jan</publication><modification>2026-06-06T04:43:37.343Z</modification><creation>2026-05-25T03:12:11.889Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12722010</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40988375</pubmed><doi>10.1192/bjp.2025.10347</doi></cross_references></HashMap>