<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Singh JA</submitter><funding>Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute</funding><pagination>1474-1486</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12750136</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>77(12)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We assessed whether shared decision-making (SDM) and patient acceptability, feasibility, and overall satisfaction with a computerized patient decision aid (PtDA) for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) differs by PtDA setting, modality, and the viewing experience.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients with SLE were invited to view a self-administered computerized SLE PtDA during regular clinic visits at 15 rheumatology clinics in an implementation trial. Patients completed a survey that included SDM measures including the decision conflict scale (DCS), Preparation for Decision Making (PDM) scale, and CollaboRATE scale, and we measured perceived patient acceptability, feasibility, and satisfaction. Patients viewed the SLE PtDA in two settings/places, in clinic or at home (t</pubmed_abstract><journal>Arthritis care &amp; research</journal><pubmed_title>Where, How, and How Much? A Multicenter Cohort Study of the Relationship Across Lupus Decision-Aid Modality, Place of Administration, Interruption and Viewing Completeness, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12750136</pmcid><funding_grant_id>SDM-2017C2-8224</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bhairavarasu K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lim S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kalunian K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramsey-Goldman R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Venturupalli S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chatham W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kamen D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beasley M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Narain S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aouhab Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Annapureddy N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ching C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Implementing Decision‐Aid for Lupus in Clinics (IDEAL) Consortium</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McMahon M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Majithia V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hearld LR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trotter K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meara A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh JA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Where, How, and How Much? A Multicenter Cohort Study of the Relationship Across Lupus Decision-Aid Modality, Place of Administration, Interruption and Viewing Completeness, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We assessed whether shared decision-making (SDM) and patient acceptability, feasibility, and overall satisfaction with a computerized patient decision aid (PtDA) for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) differs by PtDA setting, modality, and the viewing experience.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients with SLE were invited to view a self-administered computerized SLE PtDA during regular clinic visits at 15 rheumatology clinics in an implementation trial. Patients completed a survey that included SDM measures including the decision conflict scale (DCS), Preparation for Decision Making (PDM) scale, and CollaboRATE scale, and we measured perceived patient acceptability, feasibility, and satisfaction. Patients viewed the SLE PtDA in two settings/places, in clinic or at home (t</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-06T09:50:37.205Z</modification><creation>2026-05-28T03:12:44.899Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12750136</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40654136</pubmed><doi>10.1002/acr.25603</doi></cross_references></HashMap>