<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>5(12)</volume><submitter>El Lakis AA</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Competency frameworks such as CanMEDS anchor medical training and accountability, yet most validations privilege educators and seldom test whether patients recognize and prioritize the same architecture. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey (February-June 2025) of Lebanese adults (N = 403) to validate, from the patient perspective, the seven CanMEDS roles and to examine sociodemographic moderators of endorsement and rank priorities. A 103-item instrument combined five-point endorsements and forced ranking. Psychometric evaluation used polychoric exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis with diagonally weighted least squares; reliability was estimated with Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω. Robust linear regressions (HC4) modeled domain scores, and multinomial logist</pubmed_abstract><journal>PLOS global public health</journal><pagination>e0005716</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12753085</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Patient perspectives on physician competence: Validation of the CanMEDS framework.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12753085</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Salameh P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El Issawi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El Lakis AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Al Tahan J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Patient perspectives on physician competence: Validation of the CanMEDS framework.</name><description>Competency frameworks such as CanMEDS anchor medical training and accountability, yet most validations privilege educators and seldom test whether patients recognize and prioritize the same architecture. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey (February-June 2025) of Lebanese adults (N = 403) to validate, from the patient perspective, the seven CanMEDS roles and to examine sociodemographic moderators of endorsement and rank priorities. A 103-item instrument combined five-point endorsements and forced ranking. Psychometric evaluation used polychoric exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis with diagonally weighted least squares; reliability was estimated with Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω. Robust linear regressions (HC4) modeled domain scores, and multinomial logist</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025</publication><modification>2026-06-06T08:22:56.988Z</modification><creation>2026-05-27T03:11:48.669Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12753085</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41468453</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pgph.0005716</doi></cross_references></HashMap>