<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ashraf M</submitter><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><pagination>534-539</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12764355</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>107(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity on ultrawide field (UWF) colour imaging (CI) and UWF fluorescein angiography (FA).&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Cross-sectional retrospective review.&lt;h4>Subjects&lt;/h4>Patients with diabetes mellitus and at least mild non-proliferative DR on UWF-CI.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>UWF-CI and UWF-FA images acquired within 1 month of each other were evaluated independently using ETDRS DR Severity Scale (DRSS) for colour photography adapted for UWF-CI and UWF-FA. Extent of non-perfusion (NP, mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>) was determined from UWF-FA images.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Agreement rate between DRSS on UWF-CI and UWF-FA.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Images from 218 eyes of 137 patients with diabetes were evaluated. Agreement rate for DRSS between UWF-CI and UWF-FA was moderate to substantial (K=0.46, Kw=0.65). Over-all, DRSS was worse in 73 (33.5%) eyes on UWF-FA and in 16 (7.3%) on UWF-CI. Compared to UWF-CI, UWF-FA identified more severe DRSS in 26.5% (1 step) and 7.34% (≥2 steps) of eyes. DRSS was worse than UWF-FA in 56 (51.4%) in early DR (ETDRS levels 20-47, N=109) and 17 (15.6%) in eyes with severe DR (53 and higher, N=109). In this cohort, the extent of NP significantly increased as eyes approach moderate non-proliferative DR (levels 43-47, p=0.0065).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>When evaluating UWF-FA images using the ETDRS colour severity scale, DRSS is graded as more severe in a substantial number of eyes than when evaluating UWF-CI. It is uncertain how the DRSS levels using UWF-FA translate to clinical outcomes, but the additional lesions detected might provide added prognostic value. These and other recent data emphasise the need of obtaining outcome data based on UWF-FA and the potential need to develop DRSS specifically tailored for UWF-FA images.</pubmed_abstract><journal>The British journal of ophthalmology</journal><pubmed_title>Evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity on ultrawide field colour images compared with ultrawide fluorescein angiograms.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12764355</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 DK036836</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Pitoc CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aiello LP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Silva PS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shokrollahi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>AbdelAl O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ashraf M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity on ultrawide field colour images compared with ultrawide fluorescein angiograms.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity on ultrawide field (UWF) colour imaging (CI) and UWF fluorescein angiography (FA).&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Cross-sectional retrospective review.&lt;h4>Subjects&lt;/h4>Patients with diabetes mellitus and at least mild non-proliferative DR on UWF-CI.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>UWF-CI and UWF-FA images acquired within 1 month of each other were evaluated independently using ETDRS DR Severity Scale (DRSS) for colour photography adapted for UWF-CI and UWF-FA. Extent of non-perfusion (NP, mm&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>) was determined from UWF-FA images.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Agreement rate between DRSS on UWF-CI and UWF-FA.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Images from 218 eyes of 137 patients with diabetes were evaluated. Agreement rate for DRSS between UWF-CI and UWF-FA was moderate to substantial (K=0.46, Kw=0.65). Over-all, DRSS was worse in 73 (33.5%) eyes on UWF-FA and in 16 (7.3%) on UWF-CI. Compared to UWF-CI, UWF-FA identified more severe DRSS in 26.5% (1 step) and 7.34% (≥2 steps) of eyes. DRSS was worse than UWF-FA in 56 (51.4%) in early DR (ETDRS levels 20-47, N=109) and 17 (15.6%) in eyes with severe DR (53 and higher, N=109). In this cohort, the extent of NP significantly increased as eyes approach moderate non-proliferative DR (levels 43-47, p=0.0065).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>When evaluating UWF-FA images using the ETDRS colour severity scale, DRSS is graded as more severe in a substantial number of eyes than when evaluating UWF-CI. It is uncertain how the DRSS levels using UWF-FA translate to clinical outcomes, but the additional lesions detected might provide added prognostic value. These and other recent data emphasise the need of obtaining outcome data based on UWF-FA and the potential need to develop DRSS specifically tailored for UWF-FA images.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Apr</publication><modification>2026-06-06T10:37:36.499Z</modification><creation>2026-05-29T03:11:58.255Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12764355</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36669774</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bjo-2022-322163</doi></cross_references></HashMap>