<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(1)</volume><submitter>Kartal A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Minimally invasive (MI) tubular decompression seeks to reduce soft‑tissue trauma compared with open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We performed a PRISMA‑compliant systematic review and meta‑analysis of comparative studies (2015-April 2025) identified in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL. Adults with symptomatic degenerative LSS undergoing MI tubular decompression or open laminectomy were included. Evaluated outcomes included surgical parameters (e.g., overall complications; dural tears, surgical site infections, reoperation), perioperative and postoperative complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Heterogeneity was measured using I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>. Random-effects models were primary; PROMs were also analyzed in a common-effect sensit</pubmed_abstract><journal>Scientific reports</journal><pagination>176</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12764488</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Minimally invasive tubular decompression versus traditional open surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12764488</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Hartl R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamad MK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Manalil NF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hussain I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kartal A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paracha S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Robayo A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Minimally invasive tubular decompression versus traditional open surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>Minimally invasive (MI) tubular decompression seeks to reduce soft‑tissue trauma compared with open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We performed a PRISMA‑compliant systematic review and meta‑analysis of comparative studies (2015-April 2025) identified in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL. Adults with symptomatic degenerative LSS undergoing MI tubular decompression or open laminectomy were included. Evaluated outcomes included surgical parameters (e.g., overall complications; dural tears, surgical site infections, reoperation), perioperative and postoperative complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Heterogeneity was measured using I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>. Random-effects models were primary; PROMs were also analyzed in a common-effect sensit</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-06T10:25:27.12Z</modification><creation>2026-05-29T03:11:24.658Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12764488</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41354742</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41598-025-28949-9</doi></cross_references></HashMap>