<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4(1)</volume><submitter>Wu Q</submitter><funding>Honda Research Institute USA</funding><pubmed_abstract>The origins of human prosociality, in particular between strangers, are multifaceted. While laboratory studies support a cost-benefit account of helping, real-life scenarios involve additional socio-emotional motives grounded in subjective intuitions. How the cost-benefit model generalizes to everyday helping behavior remains unclear. In this study, we comprehensively assessed how motivations jointly shape helping across 100 naturalistic helping scenarios: an online sample (N&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> = 215) rated willingness to help after reading brief vignettes, and a subset (N&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> = 140) rated the strengths of candidate motivations elicited by each scenario. Two key factors-benefit to both helper and helpee, and cost to the helper-were identified through a factor analysis of the motivation ra</pubmed_abstract><journal>Communications psychology</journal><pagination>2</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12770495</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Prosocial decisions in naturalistic helping scenarios are predicted by cost-benefit tradeoffs and individual disposition.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12770495</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Dunning D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Song M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tian D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ayoub J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moradi-Pari E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Prosocial decisions in naturalistic helping scenarios are predicted by cost-benefit tradeoffs and individual disposition.</name><description>The origins of human prosociality, in particular between strangers, are multifaceted. While laboratory studies support a cost-benefit account of helping, real-life scenarios involve additional socio-emotional motives grounded in subjective intuitions. How the cost-benefit model generalizes to everyday helping behavior remains unclear. In this study, we comprehensively assessed how motivations jointly shape helping across 100 naturalistic helping scenarios: an online sample (N&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> = 215) rated willingness to help after reading brief vignettes, and a subset (N&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> = 140) rated the strengths of candidate motivations elicited by each scenario. Two key factors-benefit to both helper and helpee, and cost to the helper-were identified through a factor analysis of the motivation ra</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-11T04:51:09.493Z</modification><creation>2026-06-11T03:08:06.373Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12770495</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41422339</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s44271-025-00371-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>